z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Use, Abuse, and Future of Neuropsychologic Testing in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Author(s) -
Scott H. Grindel
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
current sports medicine reports
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.424
H-Index - 51
eISSN - 1537-8918
pISSN - 1537-890X
DOI - 10.1097/01.csmr.0000306513.79430.03
Subject(s) - concussion , medicine , poison control , traumatic brain injury , injury prevention , human factors and ergonomics , occupational safety and health , suicide prevention , medical emergency , psychiatry , pathology
A comparison is made between abbreviated formal neuropsychologic testing programs and computerized neuropsychologic programs such as ImPACT, Headminders, CogSport, and others. Issues of time, cost, need for supervision, liability, and validation are discussed. Specific time and monetary costs per athlete are calculated for each program. The estimated cost is between $22 and $27 per athlete for abbreviated formal testing and between $669 and $677 per athlete for computerized testing. Because of the significant time and monetary costs of neuro-psychologic testing, its lack of validation in deter-mining recovery, limited validation and utility in diagnosing concussion, and its numerous logistic concerns, its widespread use is probably not justified until appropriate data are published and costs contained. Recommendations for alternative evaluation techniques are suggested.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here