Premium
Pavlovian Conditioning With Ethanol: Sign‐Tracking (Autoshaping), Conditioned Incentive, and Ethanol Self‐Administration
Author(s) -
Krank Marvin D.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
alcoholism: clinical and experimental research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.267
H-Index - 153
eISSN - 1530-0277
pISSN - 0145-6008
DOI - 10.1097/01.alc.0000092060.09228.de
Subject(s) - incentive salience , self administration , psychology , reinforcement , classical conditioning , conditioning , addiction , ethanol , operant conditioning , incentive , neuroscience , lever , cue reactivity , developmental psychology , social psychology , pharmacology , chemistry , medicine , craving , statistics , physics , mathematics , organic chemistry , quantum mechanics , economics , microeconomics
Background: Conditioned incentive theories of addictive behavior propose that cues signaling a drug's reinforcing effects activate a central motivational state. Incentive motivation enhances drug‐taking and drug‐seeking behavior. We investigated the behavioral response to cues associated with ethanol and their interaction with operant self‐administration of ethanol. Methods: In two experiments, rats received operant training to press a lever for a sweetened ethanol solution. After operant training, the animals were given Pavlovian pairings of a brief and localized cue light with the sweetened ethanol solution (no lever present). Lever pressing for ethanol was then re‐established, and the behavioral effects of the cue light were tested during an ethanol self‐administration session. Results: The conditioned responses resulting from pairing cue lights with the opportunity to ingest ethanol had three main effects: (1) induction of operant behavior reinforced by ethanol, (2) stimulation of ethanol‐seeking behavior (magazine entries), and (3) signal‐directed behavior (i.e., autoshaping, or sign‐tracking). Signal‐directed behavior interacted with the other two effects in a manner predicted by the location of the cue light. These conditioned responses interact with operant responding for ethanol reinforcement. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate the importance of Pavlovian conditioning effects on ethanol self‐administration and are consistent with conditioned incentive theories of addictive behavior.