z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Can risk stratification improve the management of acute upper-gastrointestinal bleeding?
Author(s) -
Thomas Creed,
Roland Valori
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
european journal of gastroenterology and hepatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.881
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1473-5687
pISSN - 0954-691X
DOI - 10.1097/00042737-200205000-00002
Subject(s) - medicine , risk stratification , intensive care medicine , endoscopy , risk assessment , gastrointestinal bleeding , emergency department , upper gastrointestinal bleeding , emergency medicine , surgery , computer security , psychiatry , computer science
Acute upper-gastrointestinal bleeding is a common indication for emergency admission to hospital. Risk-stratification scores have been devised to identify patients at risk of re-bleeding or death, but these have usually required both clinical and endoscopic assessment. Two recent studies have employed clinical criteria alone to identify low-risk patients that may not require admission or in-patient endoscopy. While each of these studies has individual merit, both are unable to answer the question of whether risk stratification improves health outcomes or resource use in acute gastrointestinal haemorrhage. They will nevertheless help the development of guidelines that enable patients to be managed more efficiently and outcomes to be compared more fairly.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here