Open AccessCOMPARISON BETWEEN DUODENAL BUTTON AND DUODENAL SEGMENT IN PANCREAS TRANSPLANTATION
Author(s) -
Anthony M. D’Alessandro,
Hans W. Sollinger,
Robert J. Stratta,
Münci Kalayoğlu,
John D. Pirsch,
Folkert O. Belzer
Publication year - 1989
Publication title -
transplantation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.45
H-Index - 204
eISSN - 1534-6080
pISSN - 0041-1337
DOI - 10.1097/00007890-198901000-00026
Subject(s) - medicine , duodenum , pancreas transplantation , transplantation , pancreas , gastroenterology , kidney transplantation
Two technical modifications have been suggested for whole-pancreas transplantation with bladder drainage. The duodenal button technique (DB [Madison]) and the duodenal segment technique (DS [Iowa]) are the most commonly performed procedures (1,2). From December 1985 until May 1988 we performed 32 combined pancreas-kidney transplants using DB and DS techniques in 17 and 15 patients, respectively. Bladder leaks, pancreatitis, bleeding episodes, and surgically related infections were all decreased with the duodenal segment technique. Metabolic acidosis was more common with DS but was easily managed with oral sodium bicarbonate. The one-year actuarial graft survival with DB is less when compared with DS (76.1% vs. 87.5%). Three technical graft losses occurred with DB vs. none with DS. One graft was lost in each group to rejection. Our results indicate that the duodenal segment technique of bladder implantation adds safety to whole-pancreas transplantation and must now be considered the procedure of choice.