Open AccessPredictive accuracy of BIA equations for estimating fat-free mass of black men
Author(s) -
Dale R. Wagner,
Vivian H. Heyward,
P. Kocina,
L. Stolarczyk,
William S. Wilson
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
medicine and science in sports and exercise
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.703
H-Index - 224
eISSN - 1530-0315
pISSN - 0195-9131
DOI - 10.1097/00005768-199707000-00018
Subject(s) - hydrostatic weighing , bioelectrical impedance analysis , mathematics , fat free mass , statistics , regression analysis , residual , linear regression , fat mass , medicine , body mass index , body weight , algorithm
This study assessed the predictive accuracy of previously published bioelectrical impedence analysis (BIA) equations in estimating the fat-free mass (FFM) of black men, 19 to 50 years. The reference method was hydrostatic weighing (HW) at residual lung volume. Body density (Db) was converted to relative body fat (%BF) for calculation of FFMHW using the Schutte et al. equation. Resistance and reactance were measured with a Valhalla bioimpedance analyzer. Age-specific, generalized, and fatness-specific BIA equations were cross validated using regression analysis. The Segal fatness-specific equations were modified using a method recommended by Stolarczyk. All of the equations significantly (P < 0.05) underestimated the average reference measure of FFMHW. However, the underestimation of FFM for the modified Segal fatness-specific equation was relatively small (-1.8 kg) and not likely to have much clinical significance. Furthermore, this equation had a high correlation with reference FFMHW (ry,y' = 0.97), low prediction errors (SEE = 2.1 kg; E = 2.7 kg), and accurately estimated the FFM within +/- 3.5 kg for 78% of the individuals in the sample. Thus, we recommend using the modified fatness-specific BIA equation for estimating the FFM of black men.