z-logo
Premium
Enhancement of Delta Aminolevulinic Acid–Photodynamic Therapy In Vivo by Decreasing Tumor pH With Glucose and Amiloride
Author(s) -
Piot Benoît,
Rousset Nathalie,
Lenz Peter,
Eléouet Sabine,
Carré Jérome,
Vonarx Véronique,
Bourré Ludovic,
Patrice Thierry
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
the laryngoscope
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.181
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1531-4995
pISSN - 0023-852X
DOI - 10.1097/00005537-200112000-00026
Subject(s) - amiloride , photodynamic therapy , protoporphyrin ix , chemistry , in vivo , pharmacology , intraperitoneal injection , biochemistry , medicine , sodium , biology , microbiology and biotechnology , organic chemistry
Objectives/Hypothesis Delta aminolevulinic acid (ALA)–induced protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) is a fluorescent sensitizer that permits detection and treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. An exogenously induced decrease in tissue pH was evaluated for its effect in enhancing cellular uptake of ALA and facilitating its transformation into PpIX. Study Design Mice grafted with HT29 colonic cancers had been given glucose and amiloride to modify the pH of tissues. Influence of pH changes has been evaluated on ALA‐induced PPIX fluorescence by optic fiber spectrofluorimetry as well as on tumor growth. Methods Results: The pH in HT 29 tumor decreased from 7.1 to 6.67 ( P <.05) after intraperitoneal injection of glucose and amiloride. The PpIX fluorescence ratios in tumor or muscle before, between, and 2 hours after glucose and amiloride injection were not higher than control ratios. Aminolevulinic acid–photodynamic therapy was more efficient on HT 29 tumor–bearing mice when the pH value was decreased with glucose and amiloride, showing a difference in the tumor growth index ratio from the 1st to 14th day of 22% between amiloride‐glucose aminolevulinic acid–photodynamic therapy and aminolevulinic acid–photodynamic therapy alone ( P <.05). Conclusions Glucose and amiloride did not change PpIX fluorescence in HT 29 tumor after intraperitoneal injection of aminolevulinic acid but enhanced aminolevulinic acid–photodynamic therapy efficacy. This was probably a result of mechanisms other than an increase in aminolevulinic acid cellular penetration and PpIX production, such as susceptibility to free radical toxicity or alteration of cellular repair enzymes under acidotic conditions. If a decrease of pH induces a more efficient photodynamic therapy as suggested by our results, an easier way to obtain this decrease than glucose and amiloride would be necessary for clinical applications.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here