Premium
Cost‐Effectiveness of the Diagnostic Evaluation of Vertigo
Author(s) -
Stewart Michael G.,
Chen Amy Y.,
Wyatt J. Robert,
Favrot Steven,
Beinart Sean,
Coker Newton J.,
Jenkins Herman A.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
the laryngoscope
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.181
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1531-4995
pISSN - 0023-852X
DOI - 10.1097/00005537-199904000-00015
Subject(s) - vertigo , medicine , physical medicine and rehabilitation , computer science , audiology , risk analysis (engineering) , surgery
Objective: To evaluate the cost‐effectiveness of several diagnostic tests used in the evaluation of vertigo. Study Design: Cost‐effectiveness analysis, using data from retrospective case review. Methods: Charts and test results were reviewed from 192 outpatients seen in an academic tertiary referral center for evaluation of vertigo. Cost‐effectiveness analysis was performed using decision analysis software, data from office and hospital charges, and expert‐based estimations of the utility of different test outcomes. Sensitivity analysis was performed using standard algorithms and wide variable ranges. Results: We found that audiologic testing, posturography, and electronystagmography were the most cost‐effective tests, and that magnetic resonance imaging and blood tests had the lowest cost‐effectiveness. The analysis was sensitive to the effects of financial costs of tests but, with a few exceptions, was typically not sensitive to the utility of test outcomes or the distribution of test results. Conclusions: The use of cost‐effectiveness analysis, the estimation of utility of test outcomes, and techniques of sensitivity analysis should help guide the clinician's decision making on appropriate testing for patients with vertigo.