Open AccessTreatment with a Combined Endothelin A/B-Receptor Antagonist Does Not Prevent Chronic Renal Allograft Rejection in Rats
Author(s) -
Claude Braun,
T Conzelmann,
Stephan Vetter,
Michael T. Schaub,
Walter Back,
Michael Kirchengast,
Stefan G. Tullius,
Peter Schnülle,
Fokko J. van der Woude,
Peter Rohmeiss
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
journal of cardiovascular pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.762
H-Index - 100
eISSN - 1533-4023
pISSN - 0160-2446
DOI - 10.1097/00005344-200010000-00003
Subject(s) - medicine , creatinine , kidney , renal function , kidney disease , endocrinology , endothelin receptor , transplantation , receptor antagonist , receptor , antagonist , urology , pharmacology
A markedly increased expression of endothelin (ET)-1 has been observed in renal allografts with chronic rejection, one of the most common causes of kidney graft loss. In this study we investigated the effect of treatment with a combined ET-A/B-receptor antagonist on the course of chronic renal allograft rejection. Experiments were performed in the Fisher-to-Lewis rat model of chronic rejection. Lewis-to-Lewis isografts and uninephrectomized Lewis rats served as controls. Animals were treated with either the oral combined ET-A/B-receptor antagonist LU224332 (20 mg/kg/day) or vehicle. Animal survival, blood pressure, creatinine clearance, proteinuria, and urinary ET excretion were investigated for 24 weeks. Kidneys were removed for light-microscopic evaluation and immunohistochemical assessment of cell-surface markers. Treatment with LU224332 did not improve survival after 24 weeks (0.47 vs. 0.38; p > 0.05 by log-rank test), nor did it have an influence on blood pressure, creatinine clearance, or proteinuria. Combined ET-A/B-receptor blockade was associated with a reduction of expression of cell-surface markers for macrophages (EDI), T-cells (R73), and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) II (F17-23-2), but did not lead to an improvement of histologic changes of chronic allograft rejection. Our data show that blocking both ET-A- and -B receptors, in opposition to a previously published beneficial effect of selective ET-A blockade, does not prevent the progression of chronic renal allograft rejection and does not prolong survival in this model. Functional integrity of the ET-B receptor therefore seems to play an important role in the nephroprotection provided by selective ET-A-receptor antagonists in chronic renal allograft nephropathy.