z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Inhaled Nitric Oxide in Cardiac Failure: Vascular Versus Ventricular Effects
Author(s) -
Christopher Hayward,
Peter G. Rogers,
Anne Keogh,
Ralph A. Kelly,
Phillip Spratt,
Peter Macdonald
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
journal of cardiovascular pharmacology
Language(s) - Uncategorized
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.762
H-Index - 100
eISSN - 1533-4023
pISSN - 0160-2446
DOI - 10.1097/00005344-199601000-00013
Subject(s) - medicine , vascular resistance , cardiology , cardiac index , pulmonary hypertension , preload , inotrope , cardiac output , heart failure , ejection fraction , nitric oxide , pulmonary wedge pressure , hemodynamics , vasodilation , anesthesia
Inhaled nitric oxide (INO) is a powerful and selective pulmonary vasodilator in pulmonary hypertension, including that related to cardiac disease. Recently, NO was shown to have a direct negative inotropic action on the myocardium, but whether INO can impair left ventricular (LV) function is not known. We administered INO during right heart catheterisation in 10 subjects with LV failure and secondary pulmonary hypertension. INO was delivered for 10 min at concentrations of 10, 20, and 40 ppm in spontaneous respiration. Average age was 49.9 years (range 19-59 years), and mean LV ejection fraction EF (LVEF) was 19.9% (range 15-27%). INO produced an average decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) of 40% as compared with baseline (p < 0.0001) with no significant change in systemic vascular resistance (SVR). There was no significant difference in the haemodynamic response to the three doses of INO. The large decrease in PVR was due mainly to an increase in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP). Cardiac index (CI) rose in 7 patients and was unchanged in 2. One patient had a marked increase in PAWP and a marked decrease in CI during administration of INO, which rapidly reversed after discontinuation of INO. This study demonstrates that the administration of INO to patients with impaired cardiac reserve may result in marked increase in ventricular preload with little benefit to pulmonary pressures. In view of the known in vitro effects of NO and the marked haemodynamic changes demonstrated in response to INO in this study, caution should be exercised when using INO in this population.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here