z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Physiologie Aspects of Continence After Colectomy, Mucosal Proctectomy, and Endorectal lleo-Anal Anastomosis
Author(s) -
Jacques Heppell,
Keith A. Kelly,
Sidney F. Phillips,
Robert W. Beart,
Robert L. Telander,
Jean Perrault
Publication year - 1982
Publication title -
annals of surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.153
H-Index - 309
eISSN - 1528-1140
pISSN - 0003-4932
DOI - 10.1097/00000658-198204000-00009
Subject(s) - medicine , colectomy , anastomosis , surgical anastomosis , general surgery , surgery , ulcerative colitis , disease
We examined the physiology of continence in 12 patients at least four months after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and endorectal ileo-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis. The mean fecal output (+/-SEM) was 598 +/- 60 gm, passed as 12 +/- 4 movements/24 hr, of which 4 +/- 1 were passed at night. The patients were generally continent during the day and could distinguish gas from stool, but 11 of 12 leaked stools at night. Anal sphincter resting pressures (71 +/- 8 cm H2O) and squeeze pressures (171 +/- 15 cm H2O) of patients were similar to those of ten healthy controls (P greater than 0.05), although the rectal inhibitory reflex was absent in the patients. After operation, the distal bowel had a pressure-volume curve of greater slope (0.15 +/- 0.05 ml/cm H2O) than it had in controls (0.07 +/- 0.01 ml/cm H2O, P less than 0.05) and a lesser maximum capacity (patients, 248 +/- 31 ml; controls, 406 +/- 26 ml; P less than 0.05). The greater the capacity of the neorectum, the fewer was the number of bowel movements/day (r = 0.91, P less than 0.001). We concluded that the operation preserved the anal sphincter, although it decreased the capacity and compliance of the distal bowel and impaired continence.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here