z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison of Filtering Efficiency of Four New In-line Blood Transfusion Filters
Author(s) -
John R. Soeter,
Glenn T. Suehiro,
Silvia Ferrin,
Peggy Nakagawa,
J. Judson McNamara
Publication year - 1975
Publication title -
annals of surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.153
H-Index - 309
eISSN - 1528-1140
pISSN - 0003-4932
DOI - 10.1097/00000658-197501000-00023
Subject(s) - medicine , blood transfusion , line (geometry) , surgery , mathematics , geometry
Efficient removal of debris from stored human blood prior to transfusion has become increasingly important. The debris, consisting largely of microaggregates of platelets and fibrin, is not effectively removed by passage through a standard transfusion filter. This study evaluated the performance of four of the currently available small pore in-line blood transfusion filters. Filters tested included the Bentley PF-127, the Pall Ultipor SQ-40, the Swank In-Line IL-200 and the Fenwal Microaggregate Blood Filter. A standard blood administration filter was also tested, the McGraw V-2950. The rate of blood flow through the filters was recorded using single and multiple units of blood. The screen filtration pressure and debris weight of the filtered blood were studied to compare effectiveness of filtration. The Swank filter was effective in debris removal and maintained good flow rates. The Bentley and Fenwall filters removed debris nearly as well, but had reduction of flow rates after smaller infusions. The Pall filter maintained high flow rates but did not remove debris as effectively, particularly with pressure infusion. The standard 170 mu pore blood transfusion filter does not remove microaggregates.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here