Open AccessPreload Index: Pulmonary Artery Occlusion Pressure Versus Intrathoracic Blood Volume Monitoring During Lung Transplantation
Author(s) -
Giorgio Della Rocca,
M. G. Costa,
Cecilia Coccia,
Livia Pompei,
Pierangelo Di Marco,
P Pietropaoli
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
anesthesia and analgesia/anesthesia and analgesia
Language(s) - Uncategorized
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.404
H-Index - 201
eISSN - 1526-7598
pISSN - 0003-2999
DOI - 10.1097/00000539-200210000-00009
Subject(s) - preload , medicine , cardiac output , cardiac index , pulmonary artery , central venous pressure , anesthesia , cardiology , pulmonary wedge pressure , pulmonary artery catheter , transplantation , stroke volume , blood volume , hemodynamics , blood pressure , heart rate
In this study, during lung transplantation, we analyzed a conventional preload index, the pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP), and a new preload index, the intrathoracic blood volume index (ITBVI), derived from the single-indicator transpulmonary dilution technique (PiCCO System), with respect to stroke volume index (SVIpa). We also evaluated the relationships between changes (Delta) in ITBVI and PAOP and DeltaSVIpa during lung transplantation. The reproducibility and precision of all cardiac index measurements obtained with the transpulmonary single-indicator dilution technique (CIart) and with the pulmonary artery thermodilution technique (CIpa) were also determined. Measurements were made in 50 patients monitored with a pulmonary artery catheter and with a PiCCO System at six stages throughout the study. Changes in the variables were calculated by subtracting the first from the second measurement (Delta(1)) and so on (Delta(1) to Delta(5)). The linear correlation between ITBVI and SVIpa was significant (r(2)=0.41; P < 0.0001), whereas PAOP poorly correlated with SVIpa (r(2) = -0.01). Changes in ITBVI correlated with changes in SVIpa (Delta(1), r(2) = 0.30; Delta(2), r(2) = 0.57; Delta(4), r(2) = 0.26; and Delta(5), r(2) = 0.67), whereas PAOP failed. The mean bias between CIart and CIpa was 0.15 l. min(-1). m(-2) (1.37). In conclusion, ITBVI is a valid indicator of cardiac preload and may be superior to PAOP in patients undergoing lung transplantation.