Open AccessA Comparison of Two Constant-Dose Continuous Infusions of Remifentanil for Severe Postoperative Pain
Author(s) -
Enrique J. Calderón,
A. Pernia,
Pedro De Antonio,
E Calderón-Pla,
L.M. Torres
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
anesthesia and analgesia/anesthesia and analgesia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1526-7598
pISSN - 0003-2999
DOI - 10.1097/00000539-200103000-00031
Subject(s) - remifentanil , medicine , anesthesia , propofol , nausea , analgesic , opioid , patient controlled analgesia , surgery , receptor
We evaluated the analgesic efficacy and safety of two continuous constant-dose infusions of IV remifentanil, without infusion rate increments or the addition of boluses, in patients with severe postoperative pain during the first 4 h after general anesthesia with IV propofol-remifentanil. Thirty patients were randomly assigned to two groups of 15 subjects each according to the remifentanil dose administered: 0.1 microg. kg(-1). min(-1) IV (Group A) or 0.05 microg. kg(-1). min(-1) IV (Group B). Rescue analgesia was provided with meperidine (0.5 mg/kg IV) when pain intensity on the simple verbal scale (SVS) > or =2. The criteria for adequate analgesia (SVS 0-1, respiratory frequency >8/min. and SpO(2) >90%) after 4 h were met by 78% and 75% of the patients in Groups A and B, respectively (P = ns). "Meperidine rescue" analgesia was significantly more in Group B (26%) than in Group A (6%) (P < 0.05). There were no cases of respiratory depression, and nausea and emesis occurred in one patient in each group (6.5%). We conclude that IV remifentanil is an effective and safe opioid for the treatment of postoperative pain at a constant dose of 0.1 microg. kg(-1). min(-1) with a need for rescue analgesia 4 times less than a constant dose of 0.05 microg. kg(-1). min(-1).