Premium
Inhibitory responses to retinohypothalamic tract stimulation in the circadian clock of the diurnal rodent Rhabdomys pumilio
Author(s) -
Schoonderwoerd Robin A.,
Torres Gutiérrez Pablo,
Blommers Ruben,
Beurden Anouk W.,
Coenen Tineke C. J. J.,
Klett Nathan J.,
Michel Stephan H.,
Meijer Johanna H.
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
the faseb journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.709
H-Index - 277
eISSN - 1530-6860
pISSN - 0892-6638
DOI - 10.1096/fj.202200477r
Subject(s) - inhibitory postsynaptic potential , excitatory postsynaptic potential , circadian rhythm , biology , stimulation , nocturnal , glutamate receptor , suprachiasmatic nucleus , neuroscience , receptor , ecology , biochemistry
In both diurnal and nocturnal mammals, the timing of activity is regulated by the central circadian clock of the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). The SCN is synchronized to the external light cycle via the retinohypothalamic tract (RHT). To investigate potential differences in light processing between nocturnal mice and the diurnal rodent Rhabdomys pumilio , we mimicked retinal input by stimulation of the RHT ex vivo. Using Ca 2+ imaging, we observed excitations as well as inhibitions of SCN neurons in response to electrical RHT stimulation. In mice, the vast majority of responses were excitatory (85%), whereas in Rhabdomys , the proportion of excitatory and inhibitory responses was similar (51% excitatory, 49% inhibitory). Glutamate blockers AP5 and CNQX blocked the excitatory responses to RHT stimulation but did not abolish the inhibitory responses in mice or Rhabdomys , indicating that the inhibitions were monosynaptically transmitted via the RHT. Simultaneous application of glutamate blockers with the GABA A antagonist gabazine blocked all inhibitory responses in mice, but not in Rhabdomys . Collectively, our results indicate that in Rhabdomys , considerably more inhibitory responses to light are present and that these responses are driven directly by the RHT. We propose that this increased proportion of inhibitory input could reflect a difference in the entrainment mechanism employed by diurnal rodents.