z-logo
Premium
Opposed regulation of type I IFN‐induced STAT3 and ISGF3 transcriptional activities by histone deacetylases (HDACS) 1 and 2
Author(s) -
Icardi Laura,
Lievens Sam,
Mori Raffaele,
Piessevaux Julie,
De Cauwer Lode,
De Bosscher Karolien,
Tavernier Jan
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
the faseb journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.709
H-Index - 277
eISSN - 1530-6860
pISSN - 0892-6638
DOI - 10.1096/fj.11-191122
Subject(s) - histone deacetylase 2 , stat2 , trichostatin a , biology , histone deacetylase , gene silencing , stat3 , stat1 , transcription (linguistics) , microbiology and biotechnology , transcription factor , cancer research , histone , stat , signal transduction , gene , genetics , linguistics , philosophy
The antiviral and antiproliferative responses mediated by type I interferons (IFNs) depend on JAK/STAT signaling and ISGF3 (STAT1:STAT2: IRF9)‐dependent transcription. In addition, type I IFNs stimulate STAT3 activation in many cell types, an event generally associated with cell cycle progression, survival, and proliferation. To gather more insight into this functionally contradictive phenomenon, we studied the regulation of STAT3 transcriptional activity upon type I IFN treatment. We show that IFNα2 stimulation strongly induces STAT3 phosphorylation, nuclear translocation, and promoter binding, yet the activation of transcription of a STAT3‐dependent reporter and endogenous genes, such as SOCS3 and c‐FOS , is impaired. Simultaneous treatment with IFNα2 and trichostatin A, as well as combined HDAC1/HDAC2 silencing, restores STAT3‐dependent reporter gene and endogenous gene expression, strongly suggesting that HDAC1 and HDAC2 are directly involved in repressing IFNα2‐activated STAT3. Of note, single silencing of only one of the two HDACs does not lead to enhanced STAT3 activity, supporting a functional redundancy between these two enzymes. In sharp contrast, HDAC1 and HDAC2 activities are required for ISGF3‐dependent gene expression. We conclude that HDAC1 and HDAC2 differentially modulate STAT activity in response to IFNα2: while they are required for the induction of ISGF3‐responsive genes, they impair the transcription of STAT3‐dependent genes.—Icardi, L., Lievens, S., Mori, R., Piessevaux, J., De Cauwer, L., De Bosscher, K., Tavernier, J. Opposed regulation of type I IFN‐induced STAT3 and ISGF3 transcriptional activities by histone deacetylases (HDACS) 1 and 2. FASEB J. 26, 240–249 (2012). www.fasebj.org

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here