z-logo
Premium
Nutrient Declarations and Nutritional Quality of Processed and Ultra‐processed Foods Sold in Guatemala
Author(s) -
AlarconCalderon Amarilys,
KrokerLobos Fernanda,
Vandevijvere Stefanie,
RamirezZea Manuel
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
the faseb journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.709
H-Index - 277
eISSN - 1530-6860
pISSN - 0892-6638
DOI - 10.1096/fasebj.31.1_supplement.45.3
Subject(s) - nutrient , sugar , added sugar , food science , trans fat , saturated fat , nutrient density , obesity , medicine , biology , ecology , cholesterol
Background Obesity and high blood pressure are major risk factors for diet‐related chronic diseases (DRCD), such as diabetes, in Guatemala. High consumption of critical nutrients (energy, saturated fat, trans fat, total sugar, added sugar and sodium) is linked to DRCD. Guatemala's current food labelling regulation mandates nutrient declarations only if healthy or nutrient claims are made. Objective To assess, for the first time, the nutritional information available on packaged foods in Guatemala and to evaluate differences in the nutritional quality of processed (P) and ultra‐processed (UP) foods according to the Nutrient Profile model of the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO). Methods Two major supermarkets in Guatemala City were selected. All packaged foods (excluding baby foods, coffee, tea, sugar, herbs and spices) were photographed to extract nutritional information if available. Declaration of critical nutrients was determined. Nutritional quality was assessed according to the Nutrient Profile model of PAHO. Results We extracted nutritional information from 3463 food products. Out of these, 7% were classified as P, and 83% as UP. The remainder 10% were unprocessed/minimally processed foods or culinary ingredients. Energy content was not declared on 16% and 10% [p= 0.005]; total fat on 17% and 10% [p=0.001]; saturated fat on 25% and 15% [p<0.0001]; trans fat on58% and 48% [p=0.002]; total sugar on 39% and 26%; [p<0.0001] added sugar on 100% and 99% [p=0.214]; and sodium or salt on 17% and 11% [p=0.004] of P and UP products, respectively. Only 38% of P and 39% of UP foods had all the nutritional information required for classification with the PAHO nutrient profile model [p=0.720]. We found excessive amounts of at least one critical nutrient in and 84% of P and 89% of UP [p=0.219] and artificial sweeteners in 9% UP products. The food group with the lowest number of nutrient declarations was processed meat and meat products. Conclusion Both processed and ultra‐processed products contain excessive amounts of critical nutrients. Several critical nutrients associated with chronic diseases are not consistently reported in labels of processed and ultra‐processed foods in Guatemala. Nutritional information is limited, and the use of a nutrient profiling system to evaluate nutritional quality is difficult due to missing information. Current regulation concerning food labelling should be revised and enforced to improve the nutritional information available to consumers in order to create healthier food environments and to stimulate the food industry to reformulate their products towards healthier alternatives. Support or Funding Information International Development Research Centre (IDRC), Canada

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here