z-logo
Premium
Movement Guided Learning as an Efficacious, Effective, and Evidence‐based Teaching Strategy Within the Undergraduate Anatomy Classroom
Author(s) -
Bentley Danielle Christine
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
the faseb journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.709
H-Index - 277
eISSN - 1530-6860
pISSN - 0892-6638
DOI - 10.1096/fasebj.31.1_supplement.388.1
Subject(s) - workbook , presentation (obstetrics) , curriculum , class (philosophy) , medical education , relevance (law) , psychology , active learning (machine learning) , gross anatomy , mathematics education , medicine , computer science , anatomy , pedagogy , surgery , accounting , artificial intelligence , political science , business , law
Within the anatomy classroom, physical movements and stretches can turn a student's own body into their personal educational tool. Such direct relevance can be useful for the undergraduate junior learner as they attempt to truly understand musculoskelatal anatomy in a meaningful way. This presentation describes the longitudinal, iterative scholarship that went in to developing, piloting, refining, and experimentally assessing Movement Guided Learning (MGL)©, a self‐directed learning workbook that guides students through applications of musculoskeletal anatomy including physical movements/stretches, surface palpations/visualizations, and extensions of knowledge with case‐based scenarios. Most recently, components of the refined MGL workbook were fully integrated as adjunct teaching activities into a large undergraduate classroom within health sciences. Using a randomized control design, the entire curriculum of muscular anatomy was divided into three equal groups; students received MGL activities for 1/3 rd of the taught muscles, students received multiple choice style review questions for 1/3 rd of the taught muscles (as an active, time‐matched control), and students received no additional learning material for 1/3 rd of taught muscles (as a non‐active control). To facilitate full integration of supplementary teaching materials, the course instructor was been made aware of group allocations, provided with all teaching materials, and embedded those materials during in‐class lecture time and during independent student activities. Final exam scores will be segmented and compared in agreement with the three experimental groups, allowing for an intra‐individual superiority assessment of MGL. Student survey responses will allow for MGL efficacy to be further assessed against student learning preferences as well as self‐reported strategy utilization. To control for inadvertent instructor‐bias, time spent on each muscle will be quantified (using video lecture capture software) and compared across the three groups There are currently 187 undergraduate students enrolled in the course with the majority of them enrolled in a global health degree (~75%) in their first year of undergraduate studies (~90%). MGL efficacy will be determined using the aforementioned mixed‐methods assessment strategies following the fall semester final exam. Based on previously reported MGL success, it is hypothesized that the MGL activities will be a useful learning adjunct, especially for students who display kinesthetic learning preferences. Support or Funding Information none to declare

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here