Premium
Activation of the Chemo‐ and Cardiopulmonary Reflexes Blunt Baroreflex Sensitivity through Independent Mechanisms
Author(s) -
PetersenJones Humphrey G,
Holbein Walter W,
Johnson Blair D,
Convertino Victor A,
Curry Timothy B,
Joyner Michael J
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
the faseb journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.709
H-Index - 277
eISSN - 1530-6860
pISSN - 0892-6638
DOI - 10.1096/fasebj.30.1_supplement.1286.1
Subject(s) - baroreflex , heart rate , reflex , blood pressure , anesthesia , medicine , reflex bradycardia , cardiology , mean arterial pressure
Background The baroreflex maintains blood pressure homeostasis by modulating sympathetic activity in response to changes in arterial pressure. Baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) is blunted by activation of either the chemo‐or cardiopulmonary reflex; however, little is known about the interaction of these two reflexes on BRS. We hypothesized that activation of the chemoreflex during stimulation of the cardiopulmonary reflex would attenuate the reduction in BRS. Methods 10 healthy male volunteers (35±3 years, BMI: 25±1 kg/m 2 ) underwent lower body negative pressure (LBNP) at −15mmHg for 5 minutes to stimulate the cardiopulmonary reflex, with chemoreflex activation (hypoxia; arterial oxygen saturation: 85±1%) and without (normoxia; arterial oxygen saturation: 98±0%). Heart rate (HR; ECG), blood pressure (BP; brachial arterial catheter), oxygen saturation (finger pulse oximeter), and ventilation (expired gases) were recorded continuously. BRS was calculated by arterial pressure waveform analysis (spectrum; WinCPRS) during baseline (BL) and LBNP. Results Baseline HR was higher during hypoxia than normoxia (62±2 vs 77±3 bpm, p<0.001) while baseline systolic BP (SBP) was not statistically differentiated between conditions (151±3 vs 149±5 mmHg, normoxia vs hypoxia, p=0.669). During normoxic LBNP, HR increased (62±2 vs 66±3 bpm, p=0.001) and SBP was unchanged (151±3 vs 151±4 mmHg, BL vs LBNP, p=0.464). During hypoxic LBNP, HR remained unchanged (77±3 vs 76±4 bpm, BL vs LBNP, p=0.693) and SBP tended to decrease (149±5 vs 139±6, BL vs LBNP, p=0.067). Baseline BRS was lower during hypoxia than normoxia (15±2 vs 9±1 ms/mmHg, p=0.012). LBNP caused a similar % reduction in BRS during normoxia and hypoxia (−14±9% vs −10±7%, p=0.772). Conclusions Contrary to our hypothesis, chemoreflex activation during LBNP does not attenuate the reduction in BRS. This suggests that the cardiopulmonary reflex and the chemoreflex blunt BRS through independent mechanisms. Support or Funding Information Funding: W81XWH‐13‐2‐0038