z-logo
Premium
Pharmacological Characterization of the Discriminative‐Stimulus Effects of the Nicotinic Agonist (+)‐Epibatidine in Squirrel Monkeys
Author(s) -
Desai Rajeev I,
Doyle Michelle R,
Bergman Jack
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
the faseb journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.709
H-Index - 277
eISSN - 1530-6860
pISSN - 0892-6638
DOI - 10.1096/fasebj.30.1_supplement.1187.4
Subject(s) - mecamylamine , cytisine , epibatidine , pharmacology , nicotinic agonist , methyllycaconitine , nicotinic antagonist , chemistry , nicotine , agonist , nicotinic acetylcholine receptor , medicine , receptor , biochemistry
The present studies were undertaken to characterize the discriminative‐stimulus (S D ) effects of (+)‐epibatidine (EPI)–an α4β2 selective nicotinic agonist that is pharmacologically similar and structurally distinct from nicotine (NIC). Using a standard two‐lever drug discrimination procedure, squirrel monkeys (n=4) were trained to discriminate i.m. injections of 0.001 mg/kg (+)‐epibatidine (EPI) from saline on a 10‐response fixed‐ratio schedule of stimulus‐termination. Results show that high efficacy nicotinic agonists [(+)‐EPI, (−)‐EPI, NIC] substituted fully for (+)‐EPI, whereas the highest doses of other nicotinic agonists produced intermediate levels of (+)‐EPI‐like S D effects [varenicline (VAR), cytisine (CYT), isoarecolone (ISO)] or did not substitute for (+)‐EPI (lobeline). Drugs from other pharmacological classes (methamphetamine, atropine, citalopram, arecoline) did not generalize for (+)‐EPI's stimulus effects. Pretreatment studies with nicotinic antagonists show that: a) mecamylamine (non‐selective) insurmountably antagonized (+)‐EPI's effects; b) dihydro‐β‐erthroidine (α4β2‐selective) surmountably (>3‐fold rightward shift) blocked (+)‐EPI's effects; and c) methyllycaconitine (α7 selective) failed to modify the S D effects of (+)‐EPI. Interestingly, the peripherally‐restricted nicotinic antagonist hexamethonium also appeared to block (+)‐EPI's S D effects (approximately 3‐fold rightward shift) suggesting that a peripheral component may also play a role in 0.001 mg/kg (+)‐EPI's discriminable effects. In further studies, pretreatment with the partial nicotinic agonists VAR and CYT did not block the S D effects of (+)‐EPI, and in fact, CYT pretreatment shifted the (+)‐EPI dose‐effect curve to the left (>3‐10‐fold). These results suggest that the discriminative‐stimulus effects of (+)‐EPI are mediated through α4β2 nicotinic receptor subtypes at which the partial agonists VAR and CYT do not exert partial antagonist actions. Support or Funding Information Supported by NIH/NIDA DA031231

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom