Premium
Ameloblastoma of the mandible
Author(s) -
Sagyndyk H.L.,
Kozhakov B.B.,
Batyrov T.W.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
the faseb journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.709
H-Index - 277
eISSN - 1530-6860
pISSN - 0892-6638
DOI - 10.1096/fasebj.29.1_supplement.lb7
Subject(s) - medicine , mandible (arthropod mouthpart) , ameloblastoma , rehabilitation , surgery , accidental , jaw bone , radical surgery , oral cavity , dentistry , cancer , implant , physical therapy , maxilla , biology , genus , botany , physics , acoustics
Under current conditions, patients began to turn in the early stages of the disease, and the emergence of large technical capabilities in most tumors are diagnosed in the early stages, when education is small. But sometimes, currently, there are cases when the tumor reaches a large size. Introduction In oral and maxillofacial surgery and a single common treatment ameloblastom is now a radical removal of education with jaw resection within healthy tissue. However, given the relatively favorable course of this disease, we believe that radicalism should be on the principle of reasonable sufficiency, not to disability patient. Research and Results: In our experience of 15 operated patients intraoral approach was performed to remove the tumor. Here is an example of a patient operated by us: the patient J. 25 years, turned over 1year after the accidental discovery of the tumor. Diagnosis: ameloblastoma in angle and body of the mandible right. Histological diagnosis is the same. Bone cavity after the above all procedures filled autobone taken from the iliac and kera‐oss in combination with a 1: 1 ratio. Bone defect restored the newly formed bone. Discussion When the above sparing surgical interventions when patients suffered sparing surgery by oral, medical rehabilitation is relatively simple and does not require social adaptation. Summary To control the possible recurrence of the tumor must be an annual survey with X‐rays for 10 years.