Premium
Inhibition of Human Acetylcholinesterase by Enantiomers of V‐Type Chemical Warfare Nerve Agents and Analogs
Author(s) -
Boeri Michael,
Kasten Shane,
Cerasoli Douglas
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
the faseb journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.709
H-Index - 277
eISSN - 1530-6860
pISSN - 0892-6638
DOI - 10.1096/fasebj.29.1_supplement.721.4
Subject(s) - enantiomer , chemistry , nerve agent , circular dichroism , chromatography , chiral column chromatography , resolution (logic) , supercritical fluid chromatography , acetylcholinesterase , racemization , stereochemistry , column chromatography , organic chemistry , enzyme , artificial intelligence , computer science
Chemical warfare nerve agents are extremely toxic organophosphorus compounds that contain a chiral phosphorus center. Analytical scale methods using a supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) system in tandem with a mass spectrometer were developed for the separation and detection of individual stereoisomers of VX, VR, and VS, and the analogs V1 thru V4. Separation was evaluated with respect to the chromatography parameter resolution (Rs) with a value of 蠅1.7 indicating complete separation. The ChiralCel OD‐H column yielded Rs values >1.7 for each V‐type compound with mobile phase modifier concentrations 蠄2%. Methods that provided the highest Rs values were scaled up to the semi‐preparative level, allowing for isolation and analysis of individual stereoisomers at >99% purity. Ellipticity (Θ) values of each enantiomer were determined by circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy. VX, V1, V2, and V3 all had a ΘMAX at 221nm, while VR, VS, and V4 had a ΘMAX at 226nm. For all agents, the first eluting isomer had a negative value at ΘMAX [(‐)Θ221‐226], while the second eluting isomers all had positive values at ΘMAX [(+)Θ221‐226]. Individual enantiomers and racemic mixtures of each agent were then incubated with recombinant human acetylcholinesterase to determine their inhibition rate constants (ki). The (+)Θ221‐226 enantiomer was found to be an average of 2‐3 orders of magnitude more inhibitory than the opposite enantiomer of the same agent. The views expressed in this poster are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the official policy of the Department of Army, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. This research was supported by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency – Joint Science and Technology Office, Medical S&T Division.