Premium
Alcohol Use Among Pregnant Ugandan Women of Mixed HIV Status is Associated with Social Environment and Food Insecurity
Author(s) -
Collins Shalean,
Natamba Barnabas,
Arbach Angela,
Widen Elizabeth,
Desai Pooja,
Khan Hijab,
Griffiths Jeffrey,
Young Sera
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
the faseb journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.709
H-Index - 277
eISSN - 1530-6860
pISSN - 0892-6638
DOI - 10.1096/fasebj.29.1_supplement.585.6
Subject(s) - environmental health , psychological intervention , medicine , demography , pregnancy , logistic regression , odds ratio , domestic violence , cohort , poison control , suicide prevention , psychiatry , genetics , pathology , sociology , biology
Antenatal alcohol use (AAU) is associated with poor health outcomes in maternal‐infant dyads. However, AAU prevalence and risk factors are poorly understood, particularly in low‐income settings. Therefore we studied correlates of any AAU among pregnant women receiving antenatal care in Gulu, Uganda. Characteristics of pregnant women enrolled in a cohort study (n=403, 33% HIV+) were assessed at multiple levels of the social‐ecological model (SEM). AAU was reported by 20.1% of participants. Beer (10.1%) and kweete (sorgum‐millet brew) (9.2%) were the most frequently consumed alcohols (Figure 1). Excessive drinking was rare; mean alcohol units consumed/month was 4.4 in those who drank. In multivariate logistic models, social environment, (partner drinking 蠅30 days/month, [Odds Ratio (OR) 2.17, p=0.03] or friends drinking 1‐29 days/month [OR 3.59, p<0.001]), maternal age [OR 1.06, p value=0.01], and greater food security [OR 0.93, p=0.02} were associated with AAU (Table 1). Many covariates of AAU seen elsewhere in sub‐Saharan Africa, including HIV, maternal depression, and domestic violence were not significant. Future research may focus on peer and partner‐based interventions and behavior change at multiple levels of SEM to reduce AAU. Funding: USAID Feed the Future Innovation Laboratory for Collaborative Research in Nutrition for Africa (AID‐OAA‐L‐10‐00006 to Tufts University). SLY was supported by NIH (K01 MH098902).Table 1. Bivariate and multivariate logistic models of any alcohol use during pregnancy among 403 pregnant Ugandans of mixed HIV statusCharacteristic Unadjusted OR p‐value Adjusted OR p‐valueMaternal CharacteristicsMaternal Age (y) 1.05 (1.00‐1.10) 0.01 1.06 (1.01‐1.12) 0.01 HIV‐positive 0.68 (0.39‐1.18) 0.17 0.60 (0.32‐1.12) 0.11 Depression score 1 1.00 (0.98‐1.02) 0.70Maternal education level ≥Primary Secondary >Secondary ref 1.04 (0.61‐1.78) 2.26 (1.01‐5.03) 0.17 0.04 ref 1.05 (0.58‐1.90) 1.03 (0.39‐2.68) 0.86 0.94Maternal NutritionFood insecurity score 2 0.95(0.91‐1.00) 0.05 0.93 (0.88‐0.99) 0.02 Dietary diversity score 3 1.17 (1.02‐1.35) 0.02Household and Interpersonal CharacteristicsPartner drinks (days/month) Never 1‐29 ≥30 ref 1.43 (0.79‐2.56) 1.87 (1.00‐3.50) 0.04 0.22 ref 1.05(0.55‐1.99) 2.17(1.06‐4.44) 0.86 0.03 Friends drink (days/month) Never 1‐29 ≥30 ref 2.99 (1.65‐5.42) 2.00 (0.74‐5.36) <0.001 0.16 ref 3.59 (1.84‐7.00) 1.78 (0.60‐5.26) <0.001 0.29 Domestic violence 4 1.53 (0.90‐2.59) 0.11 1.63 (0.91‐2.90) 0.09 Asset score 5 1.13 (1.01‐1.27) 0.02 1.06 (0.93‐1.22) 0.34Community and Environmental CharacteristicsUrban residence 0.88 (0.48‐1.60) 0.67Displaced during civil war 1.36 (0.76‐2.43) 0.29Lived in an internally displaced persons camp 0.95(0.58‐1.55) 0.84Years displaced to IDP camp None 1‐4 5‐10 >10 ref 0.90 (0.18‐4.57) 1.00 (0.18‐5.28) 1.00 (0.20‐4.91) 0.90 1.00 0.991 Depression score (0‐56) Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES‐D) 2 Individually‐Focused Food Insecurity Access Scale (IFIAS); Natamba et al., 2014 3 Dietary diversity (0‐26), FAO HDDS Scale; FAO 2011 4 Domestic violence: sexual and physical violence within the past year 5 Asset score (0‐12) based on possession of 12 household items of value[figure1]