Premium
Multiple Micronutrients And Early Learning Interventions Promote Infant Micronutrient Status And Development
Author(s) -
FernandeezRao Sylvia,
Hurley Kristen,
Nair Madhavan,
Balakrish,
Tilton Nicholas,
Radhakrishna V,
Reinhart Greg,
Harding Kimberly,
Black Maureen
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
the faseb journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.709
H-Index - 277
eISSN - 1530-6860
pISSN - 0892-6638
DOI - 10.1096/fasebj.29.1_supplement.28.2
Subject(s) - micronutrient , medicine , underweight , psychological intervention , micronutrient deficiency , malnutrition , pediatrics , soluble transferrin receptor , placebo , ferritin , iron deficiency , anemia , environmental health , iron status , body mass index , overweight , alternative medicine , pathology , psychiatry
Background Malnutrition and lack of early learning (EL) opportunities are major causes for children not reaching their developmental potential.
Objective To evaluate the impact of multiple micronutrient powder (MNP) and EL intervention on infants' micronutrient status and development.
Methods 497 infants (6‐12 mos) were enrolled from 26 villages in rural India and randomized using a 2X2 design to receive MNP (iron, zinc, vitamins A,B2,B12, C and folic acid ) vs. placebo (B2) and EL vs. control. The EL intervention was based on the UNICEF‐developed Care for Child Development and delivered through biweekly home visits. Baseline, post‐intervention (6 mos) and follow‐up (12 mos) evaluations included 2ml venous blood and Mullens Scales of Early Learning. Data were analyzed using 2‐way ANOVA, adjusting for baseline, with MNP X EL interactions to assess intervention synergy.
Results No baseline differences (66% anemic (Hb<11 g/dL), 31% inadequate iron stores (ferritin > 12 µg/L), 20% stunted (HAZ<‐2), 19% underweight (WAZ<‐2). At follow‐up, the prevalence of micronutrient (MN) deficiencies was significantly lower in the MNP group. Significant interactions in motor and language performance showed that children who received either or both interventions had better scores than children who received neither.Table 1. Percent MN Deficiencies at Follow‐Up * p < .05MNP PlaceboInfant % %Hemoglobin (< 11g/dL) * 50.2 74.2 Ferritin (<12 ug/L) * 32.6 81.6 Transferrin receptor (> 2mg/L) * 44.1 81.7 Vitamin B12 (<200p/mL) * 2.6 9.1 Zinc (<65 ug/dL) 2.1 1.8Table 2. MNP x EL Interaction at Post Intervention: Mean (SE) * p<.05MNP PlaceboEL Control EL ControlGross Motor 50.2 (1.0) 51.8 (1.0) 51.7 (1.0) 48.7 (1.0) *Language 38.9 (0.6) 39.3 (0.6) 40.3 (0.6) 48.1 (0.6) *Conclusion Home MNP and EL can improve infant MN status and development.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom