Premium
The effects of a beef‐based meal compared to a calorie matched bean‐based meal on appetite and food intake (640.2)
Author(s) -
Bonnema Angela,
Thomas William,
Slavin Joanne
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
the faseb journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.709
H-Index - 277
eISSN - 1530-6860
pISSN - 0892-6638
DOI - 10.1096/fasebj.28.1_supplement.640.2
Subject(s) - meal , appetite , food science , calorie , medicine , zoology , chemistry , biology
Protein and fiber have strong satiety‐inducing potential. Beef is a high quality, protein‐rich food. Beans contain moderate levels of protein as well as fiber. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of a high protein meal (beef) compared to a moderate protein, high fiber meal (beans) on subjective appetite and energy intake at a subsequent meal. Twenty‐eight adults, 14 men (ages 24±5y, BMI 23±2 kg/m 2 ) and 14 women (ages 25±5y, BMI 22±2 kg/m 2 ) consumed two test lunches including a “meatloaf” made from either beef or beans. The beef meal provided 22 grams of protein and 2 grams of fiber while the bean meal provided 14 grams of protein and 10 grams of fiber. An ad libitum snack was given 3 hours after the test meal. Visual analogue scales were used to assess hunger, satiety, fullness, and prospective food intake. Gastrointestinal (GI) tolerance was assessed over 24 hours. No difference between the beef and bean was observed for appetite ratings over 3 hours, food intake at the subsequent meal (632±75 kcal vs 611±75 kcal, respectively), or sum of GI score (2.2±0.5 vs 2.9±0.5, respectively). Gas and bloating were reported more often after the bean meal than the beef meal (2.0±0.4 vs 1.3±0.4, p‐value 0.057). A beef‐based meal with high protein and a bean‐based meal with moderate protein and high fiber produced similar satiety, while the bean‐based meal resulting in higher, yet moderate, gas and bloating. Grant Funding Source : MN Beef Council