Premium
Evaluating face validity of a parent survey used to evaluate a Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program‐Education youth program in Arkansas (625.6)
Author(s) -
Hereford Avigael Rhodes,
Phelps Josh,
Rodibaugh Rosemary,
Crook Tina,
Gonzales Dana,
Hakkak Reza
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
the faseb journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.709
H-Index - 277
eISSN - 1530-6860
pISSN - 0892-6638
DOI - 10.1096/fasebj.28.1_supplement.625.6
Subject(s) - focus group , face validity , medical education , psychology , government (linguistics) , ethnic group , program evaluation , perception , data collection , applied psychology , medicine , developmental psychology , political science , psychometrics , sociology , social science , linguistics , philosophy , public administration , neuroscience , anthropology , law
In order to assess effectiveness of nutrition education programs, evaluation of nutrition programing must be completed. Effective program evaluation stems from using valid evaluative tools. The purpose of this project was to evaluate face validity of a parent survey used as an evaluation tool for a Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program‐Education (SNAP‐Ed) program conducted in public elementary schools across Arkansas. Data for this project were previously gathered through completion of seven focus groups. Focus groups were held in seven different counties in Arkansas consisting of 3‐14 participants per focus group for a total 46 participants. Participants were parents of elementary school children in SNAP‐Ed program schools. A domain analysis approach was used to complete a transcript‐based analysis of focus group data. Results were used to revise the parent survey reflecting participant perceptions to enhance face validity. Focus group data consistently brought to light similar suggestions for revision, including how questions address race and ethnicity, and participation in government assistance programs, as well as wording to be more inclusive of the entire family to provide more accurate measurement of change. Participant perceptions contributed to evaluating face validity of the survey and bringing about revision. Further evaluation is required to confirm whether changes were beneficial.