Premium
Comparison of response rates, intake estimates, and preferences between the National Cancer Institute’s Automated Self‐Administered 24‐Hour Recall and interviewer‐administered Automated Multiple Pass Method recalls (36.7)
Author(s) -
Subar Amy,
DixitJoshi Sujata,
Potischman Nancy,
Kirkpatrick Sharon,
Alexander Gwen,
Coleman Laura,
Kushi Lawrence,
Groesbeck Michelle,
Sundaram Maria,
Clancy Heather,
Zimmerman Thea,
Douglass Deirdre,
Mittl Beth,
George Stephanie,
Kahle Lisa,
Thompson Frances
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
the faseb journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.709
H-Index - 277
eISSN - 1530-6860
pISSN - 0892-6638
DOI - 10.1096/fasebj.28.1_supplement.36.7
Subject(s) - recall , medicine , interview , demography , portion size , psychology , food science , sociology , political science , law , cognitive psychology , chemistry
Objective: To compare response rates, intake estimates, and preferences between ASA24 and interviewer‐administered AMPM recalls. Methods: About 1200 participants were recruited from three integrated health systems using quota sampling to ensure representation of a range of ages and race/ethnicity groups. Participants were asked to complete two 24HRs, 4‐7 weeks apart, and randomized into four study groups: 1) two ASA24s; 2) two AMPMs; 3) ASA24 first and AMPM second; and 4) AMPM first and ASA24 second. Results: Almost all enrolled participants (95%) completed at least one recall and 80% completed two; response rates did not differ by recall mode. Estimated intakes of energy, nutrients and food groups were comparable for ASA24 and AMPM; for example, energy, 2132 vs. 2126 kcal; fat, 84.9 vs. 82.8 g; saturated fat, 27.9 vs. 26.9 g; fiber, 18.4 vs. 18.4 g; and fruits and vegetables, 3.0 vs. 3.1 cup equivalents. Of participants completing one ASA24 and one AMPM, a greater percentage overall and by sex and site preferred ASA24. Discussion: These findings show that ASA24 performs well relative to AMPM recalls. ASA24 offers significant savings over interviewer‐administered recalls, is publicly available from NCI at no charge, and has been used in over 800 studies to collect over 113,000 recalls, indicating its feasibility for use in large‐scale research. ASA24 is currently being updated to run on mobile applications.