z-logo
Premium
Characterization of breathing following four weeks of prolonged dietary Bisphenol A exposure in mice
Author(s) -
Baker Kristin,
Liang Chen,
Benson Marisa,
DeRuisseau Keith,
DeRuisseau Lara
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
the faseb journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.709
H-Index - 277
eISSN - 1530-6860
pISSN - 0892-6638
DOI - 10.1096/fasebj.27.1_supplement.930.27
Subject(s) - bisphenol a , endocrinology , medicine , estrogen , ventilation (architecture) , endocrine disruptor , respiratory minute volume , chemistry , zoology , tidal volume , endocrine system , hormone , respiratory system , biology , mechanical engineering , organic chemistry , engineering , epoxy
Bisphenol A (BPA) is a chemical used in the production of various plastics. It is classified as an endocrine disruptor since it can exert estrogen‐like effects in the body. Although estrogen can play a role in the control of breathing, it is unknown if BPA influences conscious ventilation. We tested the hypothesis that 4 weeks of dietary BPA administration would result in an altered pattern of breathing compared to the response of dietary controls. At 8 weeks of age, male CD‐1 mice were housed in polypropylene cages and administered a soybean oil‐free diet (AIN‐93G) for 2 weeks. At 10 weeks of age the mice were placed onto control (C: AIN‐93G; n=4), C+ethinyl estradiol (EE: 0.1 ppb; n=5) or C+BPA (50 mg BPA/kg diet; n=5) diets. Unrestrained barometric plethysmography was used to quantify frequency (F; breaths/min), tidal volume (TV; mL/breath), and minute ventilation (MV; mL/min) in 14 week old mice during exposure to room air (MEAN±SEM). Control mice displayed similar F (C: 150±28 vs. C+BPA: 129±11 vs. C+EE: 150±25), TV (C: 0.35±0.01 vs. C+BPA: 0.49±0.05 vs. C+EE: 0.48±0.07) and MV (C: 54.4±9.5 vs. C+BPA: 62.5±10.3 vs. C+EE: 69.8±9.6). These preliminary findings indicate no difference in quiet breathing following 4 weeks of dietary BPA or EE administration in mice. Supported by LMC start‐up funds (LRD) and the Hill Collaboration on Environmental Medicine (KCD).

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here