z-logo
Premium
Repeated measures of eating competence over a 12‐month nutrition education program revealed rebound following early decline: Implications for interventions planned to enhance eating competence
Author(s) -
Psota Tricia,
Lohse Barbara,
KrisEtherton Penny
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
the faseb journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.709
H-Index - 277
eISSN - 1530-6860
pISSN - 0892-6638
DOI - 10.1096/fasebj.27.1_supplement.626.6
Subject(s) - psychological intervention , overweight , medicine , waist , obesity , competence (human resources) , emotional eating , eating behavior , physical therapy , psychology , psychiatry , social psychology
Eating competence (EC), an intra‐individual approach to eating and food behaviors that entrains positive biopsychosocial outcomes, is measured with the Satter EC Inventory (ecSI). Early studies show a decline in EC after short (< 4 mo) interventions, possibly resulting from increased awareness/discomfort with eating behavior. A 26‐lesson, Dietary Guidelines ‐based education intervention with lower‐fat and moderate‐fat versions was assessed at baseline (BL), 4 mo, and 12 mo in overweight/obese premenopausal women (n=101) with a set of biomedical measures that included the ecSI. EC and biomedical findings did not differ between intervention groups or those completing 3 (n=40; 39.7 ± 6.2 y; BMI: 30.7 ± 4.2 kg/m 2 ), or < 3 assessments (n=61; 38.4 ± 6.5 y; BMI: 30.9 ± 4.3 kg/m 2 ). Replicating earlier studies, EC women had or tended toward lower BMI (P=.095), waist circumference (P=.04), uncontrolled (P=.07) and emotional eating (P=.09). ecSI decreased from BL to 4 mo (26.2 ± 1.0 to 24.9 ± 1.3) and rebounded at 12 mo (31.4 ± 1.0; P<.001, compared to BL and 4 mo). This pattern persisted for those in the lower‐fat group and when controlling for weight change. ecSI remained the same at 4 mo in the moderate‐fat group; however scores significantly increased by 12 mo (P<.001, compared to BL and 4 mo). Findings support increased intervention dosage and serial measures to accurately portray intervention effect on EC status. Funded by USDA.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here