Premium
Comparison of 3D Reconstructive Technologies used for Morphometric Research and the Translation of Knowledge using a Decision Matrix
Author(s) -
Martin Charys M,
Roach Victoria A,
Nguyen Ngan,
Rice Charles L,
Wilson Timothy D
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
the faseb journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.709
H-Index - 277
eISSN - 1530-6860
pISSN - 0892-6638
DOI - 10.1096/fasebj.27.1_supplement.532.1
Subject(s) - usability , computer science , software , best practice , interface (matter) , software engineering , selection (genetic algorithm) , human–computer interaction , user interface , data science , artificial intelligence , management , bubble , operating system , maximum bubble pressure method , parallel computing , economics , programming language
The use of three‐dimensional (3D) models for education and measurement has become more prevalent, which has resulted in an increase in 3D reconstructive software programs. These programs differ in reconstruction concepts, operating system requirements, user features, cost, and no one program has emerged as the standard. The purpose of the current study was to conduct a systematic comparison of three widely available 3D reconstructive software programs, Amira, OsiriX, and Mimics, with respect to the software's ability to be used in morphometric research and education to translate morphological knowledge. Cost, system requirements, and inherent features of each program are compared. A novel concept selection tool, a decision matrix, was employed to objectify comparisons of usability of the interface, quality of the output, and efficiency of the tools. Findings indicate that Mimics was the best‐suited program for construction of 3D anatomical models and morphometric analysis, but for creating a learning tool the results were less clear. OsiriX was very user‐friendly; however, it had limited capabilities. Conversely, although Amira had endless potential and could create complex dynamic videos, it had a challenging interface. These results provide a resource for morphometric researchers and educators to assist the selection of appropriate reconstruction programs when starting a new 3D modelling project. Grant Funding Source : Departmental