z-logo
Premium
Perceptions surrounding food preferences and avoidances in pregnant and lactating women in the Western Highlands of Guatemala
Author(s) -
Rosario García María,
Vossenaar Marieke,
Bonorden Melissa JL,
Solomons Noel W
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
the faseb journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.709
H-Index - 277
eISSN - 1530-6860
pISSN - 0892-6638
DOI - 10.1096/fasebj.27.1_supplement.232.5
Subject(s) - focus group , psychological intervention , attendance , perception , psychology , intervention (counseling) , pregnancy , environmental health , qualitative research , medicine , nursing , biology , sociology , political science , neuroscience , social science , anthropology , law , genetics
Background The health and nutrition of the mother are the most directly accessible element of the 1000‐days window‐of‐opportunity. Determining patterns of food avoidances and preferences should allow efficient interventions specifically targeting maternal nutrition. Objective To conduct formative research on dietary selection in pregnancy (P) and lactation (L) using qualitative methods. Methods Six focus‐groups were conducted with attendance of 5–12 women, 3 with P and 3 with L women. They were conducted with a reflective dialogues‐focus. Sessions were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using HyperResearch®. Results The perception was that dietary specificity (both selections and omissions) was more important during L than in P, with the caveats that foods considered to provoke nausea were avoided, but cravings were viewed as not to be resisted. Diet during L was seen as supporting both the quantity and quality of milk, with thin gruels (atoles) judged superior. “Hot” and “Cold” concepts guided dietary choices during both L and P. Noxious elements in both the external and internal maternal milieu were considered transmissible through milk. Conclusion Sensitivity to community perceptions of best eating practices in L and P is essential to guiding dietary intervention in this setting. Funded by Hormel Foods Corporation

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here