z-logo
Premium
The Characterization of Iron Status in InCHIANTI: The Use of a Higher Ferritin Cutoff
Author(s) -
Chen Lenis,
Murray-Kolb Laura E.,
Patel Kushang V.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
the faseb journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.709
H-Index - 277
eISSN - 1530-6860
pISSN - 0892-6638
DOI - 10.1096/fasebj.26.1_supplement.627.2
Subject(s) - ferritin , cutoff , iron deficiency , anemia , medicine , soluble transferrin receptor , iron status , cohort , gastroenterology , serum ferritin , hemoglobin , population , physical therapy , environmental health , physics , quantum mechanics
Iron is critical for physiological and mental function. The purpose of this study was to characterize iron status in 1,043 Italians >65 yr in the InCHIANTI study. Complete blood count (CBC) measures, transferrin receptor and ferritin were considered. The high prevalence of suggestive inflammation (>60%) in InCHIANTI, combined with literature supporting a higher ferritin cutoff for older people, provided a compelling case to use a ferritin cutoff of 45 μg/L rather a traditional cutoff of 15 μg/L as a criterion for iron deficiency. This cutoff and/or other iron and CBC cutoffs were used to characterize four stages of iron status: 1) iron deficiency anemia; 2) non‐anemic iron deficiency; 3) iron sufficiency; and 4) iron overload. The prevalence of individuals in each stage was 4.2%, 5.7%, 34.5% and 12.0%, respectively, while 43.6% of the population's iron status was not clearly definable according to strict cutoffs. These results suggested both a concerning prevalence of iron overload and iron deficiency in this Italian cohort. Using the traditional ferritin cutoff of 15 μg/L reduced the number of people classified as iron deficient by 47.6%, potentially misclassifying those individuals. The accurate characterization of iron status in the elderly is necessary to properly identify those who could benefit from treatment. Grant Funding Source : This research was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute on Aging, NIH

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here