z-logo
Premium
Evaluation of Uosm:Posm ratio and Posm as Hydration Biomarkers in Healthy Young Women During Daily Activities
Author(s) -
Armstrong Lawrence E,
Johnson Evan C,
Munoz Colleen X,
LeBellego Laurent,
Klein Alexis,
Casa Douglas J,
Maresh Carl M.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
the faseb journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.709
H-Index - 277
eISSN - 1530-6860
pISSN - 0892-6638
DOI - 10.1096/fasebj.26.1_supplement.1084.14
Subject(s) - chemistry , morning , zoology , fluid intake , plasma osmolality , medicine , endocrinology , biology , vasopressin
The urine‐to‐plasma osmolality ratio (U osm :P osm ) is used clinically to diagnose renal and metabolic disorders. U osm :P osm <1 also represents a state of relative water excess. Diet records of 120 college women were analyzed [beverage water + food water = total fluid intake (TFI)] for 5d to identify 14 high volume (HIGH) and 14 low volume (LOW) drinkers (age, 20.3±1.7 y). Experimental protocol: 2 baseline days verified ad libitum TFI status of HIGH (3.21 L/d) and LOW (1.64 L/d). During a controlled intervention (days 3–6) with mineral water (Volvic™), HIGH consumed less than baseline (TFI, 2.00 L/d; H↔L) and LOW consumed more than baseline (TFI, 3.50 L/d; L↔H). On ad libitum recovery day 7, TFI were: HIGH, 3.17, LOW, 1.71 L/d. Duplicate U osm (24h collection) and P osm (morning) samples were analyzed via freezing point depression osmometry. Mean (± SD) U osm :P osm were H↔L: d1, 1.3±0.4; d2, 1.4±0.5; d3, 2.0±0.8; d4, 2.1±0.9; d5, 2.1±0.8; d6, 2.0±0.8; d7, 1.2±0.6. L↔H: d1, 2.7±0.7; d2, 2.6±0.6; d3, 0.9±0.2; d4, 0.9±0.3; d5, 0.9±0.1; d6, 1.0±0.4; d7, 1.9±0.7. 11/13 of U osm :P osm <1 values occurred for H↔L on d1, d2 and d7, and 32/33 occurred for L↔H on d3 to d6. Mean daily P osm values were similar (7d range: H↔L, 292 – 295; L↔H, 293 – 296 mOsm/kg), reflecting neuroendocrine regulation. These data indicate that U osm :P osm warrants further investigation as an index of human hydration status across days. Funded by Danone Research, France.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here