z-logo
Premium
Impaired urinary nitrates plus nitrites (UNOx) in high‐NaCl fed Ksp‐cadherin‐targeted insulin receptor knockout (KO) mice is insensitive to Tempol
Author(s) -
Garikepati Radha Mayuri,
Li Lijun,
Tiwari Swasti,
Ecelbarger Carolyn M.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
the faseb journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.709
H-Index - 277
eISSN - 1530-6860
pISSN - 0892-6638
DOI - 10.1096/fasebj.25.1_supplement.1028.12
Subject(s) - chemistry , medicine , endocrinology , urine , sodium , receptor , knockout mouse , superoxide dismutase , oxidative stress , biochemistry , organic chemistry
Previously, we showed significantly reduced UNOx in mice lacking the insulin receptor in renal tubule (primarily distal) by targeted knockout. To address the possibility that increased destruction of NO by superoxide in the KO might explain these findings, 3‐month‐old male KO and WT littermates were fed serially medium‐ (0.5% NaCl, MS), low‐ (0.08% NaCl, LS), and high‐NaCl (5% NaCl, HS) diets for one week each followed by a week of HS plus 3 mM Tempol, a superoxide dismutase mimetic, in drinking water. On day 5 each week, 24‐hr urine was collected. Starting body weights (BW) were not different. However, final BWs were significantly higher in KO mice (g): 30.5 ± 0.7, WT versus 33.1 ± 0.4, KO, p = 0.03. Urine volumes, sodium or potassium were not significantly different between genotypes under any condition. No genotypic differences in UNOx were observed when mice were fed the LS diet (μmol/kg·bw/d): 28.6 ± 4.0, WT and 27.4 ± 5.7, KO, p = 0.87. HS feeding led to a small decrease in WT, but decreased UNOx in KO by over 50% (20.2 ± 4.3, WT and 11.3 ± 0.5, KO, p = 0.057). Tempol did not correct this difference, nor significantly affect WT levels of UNOx (21.1 ± 2.3, WT and 9.2 ± 2.7, KO, p = 0.036). Our results suggest that KO mice are more sensitive to HS feeding with regard to UNOX and weight gain. This deficit in UNOx does not appear to be due to relatively increased superoxide activity. Thus genotypic differences may be the result of reduced NO production.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here