z-logo
Premium
Development of Drugs with Dual Dopamine Transporter and Sigma 1 Receptor Activity
Author(s) -
Kopajtic Theresa,
Cao Jianjing,
Hiranita Takato,
Tanda Gianluigi,
Newman Amy H.,
Katz Jonathan L
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
the faseb journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.709
H-Index - 277
eISSN - 1530-6860
pISSN - 0892-6638
DOI - 10.1096/fasebj.23.1_supplement.745.5
Subject(s) - dopamine transporter , chemistry , antagonist , sigma receptor , stereochemistry , dopamine , receptor , in vivo , transporter , pharmacology , biochemistry , medicine , biology , microbiology and biotechnology , gene
Prior results suggest that rimcazole and its analogues decrease cocaine self administration (SA) through actions mediated by antagonist effects at sigma 1 receptors (σ 1 Rs) along with blockade of the dopamine transporter (DAT). The present study compared several analogues of rimcazole for the optimum ratio of σ 1 R to DAT affinity for effects on cocaine SA. SH‐324, which had a 2‐fold σ 1 R/DAT affinity ratio, was approximately 3‐fold more potent than rimcazole and SH‐328 in attenuating cocaine SA. The latter two compounds had respective σ 1 R/DAT affinity ratios of 9.14 and 0.11, suggesting that the optimum ratio lies between those values. Rimcazole analogues with varying affinities and selectivities for DAT and σ 1 Rs were prepared (Cao et al. 2003; 2008). The hydroxylated linking chain analogue, JJC 2‐010 [(±)3‐(4‐(3‐(bis(4‐fluorophenyl)amino)propyl)piperazin‐1‐yl)‐1‐phenylpropan‐1‐ol], and its N‐benzyl analogue, JJC 2‐006, had a σ 1 R/DAT affinity ratios of 13.04 and 0.27, respectively. Ester analogues of JJC 2‐010 were prepared which had σ 1 R/DAT affinity ratios varying from 16.34 to 0.86. In contrast to rimcazole, these novel compounds had high affinity for the DAT ranging from 1.72 to 51.3 nM, and affinity for σ 1 Rs ranging from 24.9 to 292 nM. Selected compounds with a range of σ 1 R/DAT affinity ratios will be tested for their cocaine antagonist effects in various in vivo procedures indicative of abuse liability.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here