z-logo
Premium
Measuring the glutamate‐glutamine cycle rate in the brain: simulated comparison between [1‐ 13 C]glucose and [2‐ 13 C]acetate
Author(s) -
Shestov Alexander A,
Deelchand Dinesh K,
Ugurbil Kamil,
Henry PierreGilles
Publication title -
the faseb journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.709
H-Index - 277
eISSN - 1530-6860
pISSN - 0892-6638
DOI - 10.1096/fasebj.21.6.lb104-a
13 C NMR together with metabolic modeling has allowed non‐invasive measurements of the glutamate‐glutamine cycle rate (V NT ) between neurons and astrocytes [1]. However, the determination of the V NT flux is not very precise when using [1‐ 13 C] or [1,6‐ 13 C 2 ]glucose as a substrate [2]. The goal of this work was to use simulations and experimental data to determine whether dynamic metabolic modeling using a glial‐specific substrate (such as [2‐ 13 C]acetate) leads to improved precision on V NT . Simulated 13 C turnover curves for glutamate and glutamine were found to be more sensitive to the value of V NT when using [2‐ 13 C]acetate than when using [1‐ 13 C]glucose as a substrate (Figure 1). When infusing [1‐ 13 C]glucose, the turnover curves for glutamate and glutamine C4 remained almost unchanged when V NT was varied by ±50%. In contrast, with [2‐ 13 C]acetate, the turnover curves for both glutamate and glutamine C4 changed noticeably. This suggests that the determination of V NT would be more reliable when infusing [2‐ 13 C]acetate compared to [1‐ 13 ]glucose. Monte‐Carlo simulations confirmed that V NT is indeed much more precise when using [2‐ 13 C]acetate: the standard deviation on V NT was 670 % for [1‐ 13 C]glucose and only 12% for [2‐ 13 C]acetate. We conclude that dynamic metabolic modeling using [2‐ 13 C]acetate as a substrate has the potential to improve the determination of the glutamate‐glutamine cycle rate V NT compared to using [1‐ 13 C] or [1,6‐ 13 C 2 ] glucose. This work was supported by NIH R01NS38672 and P41RR08079. 1Sensitivity of glutamate and glutamine 13 C turnover curves to the value of the glutamate‐glutamine cycle rate V NT when using (a) [1‐ 13 C]glucose and (b) [2‐ 13 C]acetate. Turnover curves were more sensitive to the value of V NT with [2‐ 13 C]acetate than with [1‐ 13 C]glucose.2Probability distribution of V NT determined by Monte‐Carlo simulations. Estimation of V NT was more precise with [2‐ 13 C]acetate than with [1‐ 13 C]glucose.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom