Premium
Nutrition marketing on children's foods
Author(s) -
Colby Sarah E.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
the faseb journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.709
H-Index - 277
eISSN - 1530-6860
pISSN - 0892-6638
DOI - 10.1096/fasebj.21.5.a300-d
Subject(s) - sugar , saturated fat , food science , food marketing , added sugar , obesity , dietary sucrose , childhood obesity , product (mathematics) , nutrition labeling , business , marketing , advertising , medicine , chemistry , mathematics , geometry , overweight , cholesterol
Given the rise in childhood obesity, marketing non‐nutrient dense foods to children has instigated a worldwide debate. This research sought to determine how often nutrition marketing (health claims, nutrient content claims, or implied claims) is used on labels of foods containing high amounts (>20% daily value) of saturated fat, sodium, and/or sugar (operationally defined as >6 grams sugar for non‐fruit/milk based products and >21grams sugar for fruit/milk based products). All items packaged with food labels (N=9,429) in one grocery store in Grand Forks, N.D. were visually surveyed. Of 1507 products perceived to be marketed to children, 73% had nutrition marketing. Of those, 59% had high saturated fat, sodium and/or sugar content; high sugar content being the most frequently identified (13.97%, 15.06%, and 49.45%, respectively). The most commonly used nutrition marketing statements were “good source of calcium”, “good source of Vitamin C”, “made with real…”, “low/trans fat free”, and “low/fat free”. Whether nutrition marketing of products with high saturated fat, sodium and/or sugar content influences consumer product choice is unknown.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom