Premium
Structure of a Therapeutic Antibody in Complex with MUC16 Reveals a Conformational Epitope Influenced by Antigen Glycosylation
Author(s) -
Brooks Cory L.,
Aguilar Eric N.,
White Brandy,
Faassen Henk,
Michaud Sarah,
Goodlett David,
Brooks Teresa,
Hussack Greg,
Henry Kevin,
Radhakrishnan Prakash
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
the faseb journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.709
H-Index - 277
eISSN - 1530-6860
pISSN - 0892-6638
DOI - 10.1096/fasebj.2022.36.s1.r5166
Subject(s) - epitope , conformational epitope , antibody , linear epitope , epitope mapping , chemistry , antigen , microbiology and biotechnology , chinese hamster ovary cell , humanized antibody , biology , cancer research , monoclonal antibody , biochemistry , immunology , receptor
The integral membrane glycoprotein Mucin‐16 (MUC16) has emerged as an important cancer antigen that displays a high degree of tumor selectivity. MUC16 is often overexpressed and involved in tumorigenesis in several malignancies, including pancreatic and ovarian cancer. The role of MUC16 in cancer progression is complex and provides multiple points for therapeutic intervention. However, despite clinical interest in MUC16 as an immunotherapy target, surprisingly little is known regarding how antibodies bind the protein. Here we report the humanization, epitope mapping, and structure determination of a MUC16 specific therapeutic antibody. The antibody was humanized using a germline complementary determining region (CDR) loop grafting approach and produced by transient transfection in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. The humanized and murine antibodies displayed nearly identical binding affinity to a recombinant MUC16 SEA ( S perm protein, E nterokinase, and Agrin) domain as measured by enzyme linked‐immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and surface plasmon resonance (SPR). High‐resolution x‐ray structures of the antibodies indicated no significant changes associated with humanization. Initial epitope mapping using an ELISA and overlapping MUC16 constructs suggested that the antibody epitope was localized to a SEA domain and was non‐linear and conformational in nature. A more detailed epitope mapping study carried out using hydrogen‐deuterium exchange mass‐spectrometry revealed five regions on the SEA domain that resulted in reduced deuteration when the antibody was bound to the antigen. These results were confirmed by x‐ray structures of the murine and humanized antibodies complex with the SEA domain. The structures revealed a complex, non‐linear structural epitope with a long b‐hairpin forming the center of the interaction. Finally, a fully glycosylated recombinant SEA domain was produced by transient transfection in CHO cells and used to assess the role of MUC16 glycosylation on antibody binding. Surprisingly, the densely glycosylated SEA domain bound the antibody with approximately 2‐fold higher affinity compared to the unglycosylated domain, suggesting a role for antigen glycosylation in mediating antibody binding. The results presented here represent the first structural characterization of an antibody in complex with MUC16 and reveal a complex, non‐linear epitope influenced by glycosylation. These findings will help to accelerate the clinical development of this promising therapeutic agent.