Premium
Beyond content knowledge: psychosocial attitude, behavior, and skill development in gross anatomy education
Author(s) -
Mussell Jason,
Harrell Kelly,
VanNuland Sonya,
BrewerDeluce Danielle,
Cornwall Jon,
Krebs Claudia,
Lazarus Michelle,
MacLeod Anna,
Wainman Bruce,
Hildebrandt Sabine,
Byram Jessica
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
the faseb journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.709
H-Index - 277
eISSN - 1530-6860
pISSN - 0892-6638
DOI - 10.1096/fasebj.2021.35.s1.03826
Subject(s) - curriculum , context (archaeology) , test (biology) , medical education , psychosocial , gross anatomy , psychology , pandemic , thematic analysis , medicine , covid-19 , pedagogy , pathology , geography , sociology , qualitative research , social science , biology , paleontology , disease , archaeology , psychiatry , infectious disease (medical specialty)
Increasing evidence suggests that acquisition of a variety of different attitudes, skills, and behaviors (or ‘non‐technical content [NTC]’) are core to gross anatomy education, alongside discipline‐based knowledge. Examples of NTC include human ethics, teamwork, and professionalism. Human donors and laboratory experiences typically serve as the foundation of NTC curriculum development and assessment. With many global institutions shifting from in‐person, human dissections to virtual laboratories, in response to the COVID‐19 pandemic, we sought to explore anatomists’ views on NTC within this novel virtual environment. MethodsEngaging mixed methods study design, and a pragmatist theoretical lens ‐ a voluntary survey (IU IRB# 2006285000) was developed and distributed internationally from July to November 2020. Additional to demographic information (including information about courses taught), questions about anatomists’ views of the importance, extent and types of NTC relevant to student learning were posed. The context included anatomists’ perceptions of these NTC both prior to and during their pandemic teaching experiences. Data were analyzed using SPSS v. 27. Differences between NTC and their assessment prior to and during the pandemic were compared using paired samples t‐test and Wilcoxon signed rank test. Free responses were analyzed using thematic analysis.Results Survey responses (n=82) represented all continents except Antarctica. Pre‐COVID‐19, respondents delivered 12% of their content online which increased to 66% online content delivery during the pandemic. Regarding the NTC, respondents expected students to acquire, only 37% is formally assessed. Overall, there was a significant decrease in the NTC assessment during the pandemic (p=0.001). Greater than 35% of respondents reported assessing the following content pre‐COVID‐19: respect for donors, teamwork, communication, clinical reasoning, and professionalism. During COVID‐19, almost all of these categories significantly decreased in the number of respondents who planned to assess these (p≤ 0.001). Fifty‐five respondents (67%) provided free responses highlighting concerns about acquisition of empathy, respect for donors, and teamwork due to reduced or eliminated dissection. ConclusionAnatomy educators report incorporating strategies into their courses to foster student development of NTC. Acquisition of these important skills remains largely a part of the hidden curriculum based on percentage of respondents assessing them. This percentage further decreased in the virtual environment. Given the availability of formative assessment types we encourage more robust and explicit incorporation into the formal curriculum.