Premium
Epithelial Mechanosensitive Ion Channel Piezo2 Contributes to Pressure‐Induced Epithelial Chloride Secretion in Mouse Colon
Author(s) -
Knutson Kaitlyn Rebecca,
Finholm Isabelle,
Treichel Anthony J.,
Whiteman Sara,
Linden David R.,
Grover Madhusudan,
Farrugia Gianrico,
Beyder Arthur
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
the faseb journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.709
H-Index - 277
eISSN - 1530-6860
pISSN - 0892-6638
DOI - 10.1096/fasebj.2020.34.s1.04209
Subject(s) - mechanosensitive channels , epithelium , microbiology and biotechnology , ussing chamber , mechanoreceptor , biology , ion channel , mechanotransduction , stimulation , anatomy , endocrinology , biochemistry , genetics , receptor
BACKGROUND Mechanical stimulation of the gastrointestinal (GI) epithelium causes changes in epithelial ion transport by an unclear mechanism. We recently discovered the mechanosensitive ion channel Piezo2 is specifically expressed by the enteroendocrine cells (EECs) and is necessary for EEC mechanosensitivity. Further, in mouse small bowel, the pharmacologic inhibition or genetic knockout of the epithelial Piezo2 led to an inhibition of the pressure‐induced short‐circuit current (I sc ) in the Ussing chamber. These results suggested that EEC Piezo2 plays a role in pressure‐induced epithelial ion transport, but the mechanism and whether these responses are region‐specific remains uknown. AIM Determine whether epithelial Piezo2‐mediated pressure‐induced I sc is due to Clsecretion in the mouse colon. METHODS Full‐thickness mid‐colon preparations of Vil Cre/+ ::Piezo2 f/f ( Piezo2 CKO ) or Vil +/+ ::Piezo2 f/f ( Piezo2 WT ) mice at 0.3 cm 2 were mounted in 4mL Ussing chambers with normal Krebs solution. The epithelial side was intermittently pressure‐clamped at a range of pressures (5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 60 mmHg) for 10s each. Forskolin (FSK, 10μM) was applied at the end of the experiments, and FSK response was used to normalize the pressure‐induced responses (ΔI sc /ΔI sc,FSK ). RESULTS Pressure applied to the mucosa of Piezo2 CKO and Piezo2 WT colons caused a pressure‐dependent increase in I sc . Responses in Piezo2 CKO colons were smaller than Piezo2 WT at 40mmHg (0.41±0.1 vs. 0.76±0.1) and 60mmHg (0.51±0.1 vs. 0.87±0.1) (n=9–11, P <0.05, two‐way ANOVA). To determine the nature of the pressure‐induced I sc we removed Cl − from the Krebs solutions. Cl‐removal resulted in XX. We found a nearloss in the mechanically induced ΔI sc in both Piezo2 WT tissues and Piezo2 CKO : 5mmHg (− 88.85±0.1% and −87.44±0.1% Piezo2 WT ), 10mmHg (−86.46±0.1% Piezo2 CKO and − 90.30±0.1% Piezo2 WT ), 20mmHg (−88.50±0.01% Piezo2 CKO and −89.86±0.1% Piezo2 WT ), 40mmHg (−91.78±0.1% Piezo2 CKO and −91.35±0.04% Piezo2 WT ), and 60mmHg (−93.93±0.04% Piezo2 CKO and −92.08±0.04% Piezo2 WT (n= 5–10, P <0.05, unpaired t ‐test). Replacement of Cl − led to full recovery of the mechanically induced ΔI sc in both Piezo2 WT and Piezo2 CKO tissues when tested at 30 mmHg ( Piezo2 WT : 2.51±1.4 vs. 73.52±33.8, n=6 and 3, P <0.05, unpaired t ‐test), ( Piezo2 CKO : 1.80±1.0 vs. 45.14±12.4, n=5 and 4, P <0.05, unpaired t ‐test). CONCLUSIONS Hydrostatic pressure applied to the colon epithelium leads to an increase in epithelial secretion that depends chloride and Piezo2 contributes to this mechanosensitive chloride secretion. Support or Funding Information Supported by AGA RSA, NIH DK106456, NIH DK119683, NIH DK123549