Premium
The PAQosome, a novel molecular chaperoning machine for assembly of human protein complexes and networks
Author(s) -
Coulombe Benoit,
Cloutier Philippe,
Pinard Maxime,
Forget Diane,
Poitras Christian,
Gauthier Marie-Soleil
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
the faseb journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.709
H-Index - 277
eISSN - 1530-6860
pISSN - 0892-6638
DOI - 10.1096/fasebj.2020.34.s1.00078
Subject(s) - ribonucleoprotein , dynein , biology , protein subunit , microbiology and biotechnology , microtubule , biogenesis , snrnp , cajal body , computational biology , flagellum , genetics , rna , gene , rna splicing
The human proteome comprises the products of more than 20,000 genes, most being arranged in complexes and networks that underlie essential cell functions. The Particle for Arrangement of Quaternary structure (PAQosome), formerly known as the R2TP/Prefoldin‐like complex, is to our knowledge the only molecular chaperoning machine designed by the evolution to assemble large protein complexes and regulatory networks in humans. The human PAQosome is a 12‐subunit complex made of two multisubunit modules, namely R2TP (RUVBL1, RUVBL2, RPAP3 and PIH1D1) and Prefoldin‐like (URI1, UXT, PDRG1, PFDN2, PFDN6 and the newly discovered ASDURF), as well as two other accessory proteins (POLR2E and WDR92). Several PAQosome clients/substrates have previously been identified, including all three nuclear RNA polymerases, various small nucleolar ribonucleoproteins (snoRNPs) and small nuclear RNPs (snRNPs), all six members of the phosphatidylinositol 3‐kinase‐related kinase (PIKK) family and others. Client specificity appears to be regulated by a number of different mechanisms, including the use of alternative core PAQosome subunits that recognize different clients directly, and the action of specificity adaptors that connect the PAQosome core to specific clients. Here, we present data identifying additional PAQosome clients, some being recruited through novel mechanisms that will be discussed. For example, and similar to what has been reported for axonemal dynein complexes involved in cilium motility, we now identify cytoplasmic dynein complexes that are responsible for cargo transport along microtubules as new clients of the PAQosome. Our recent data also indicate that specific phosphorylation of PAQosome subunits is at play for recognition of an important newly‐identified client, the pre‐ribosome, which is recruited to the PAQosome along with multiple ribosome biogenesis factors. Detailed mechanisms of assembly of some client complexes as well as the effect of mutations causing genetic diseases on complex/network integrity and PAQosome function will be presented. Characterization of the PAQosome is important not only to elucidate a newly‐recognized basal mechanism of gene regulation in eukaryotes but also to explore new research avenues that can lead to development of novel therapeutic and diagnostic tools.