Premium
Rare Case of a Five‐Branched Aortic Arch Exhibiting a Retroesophageal Right Subclavian Artery and an Accessory Left Vertebral Artery
Author(s) -
Granite Guinevere,
Meshida Keiko,
Jones Shiloh
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
the faseb journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.709
H-Index - 277
eISSN - 1530-6860
pISSN - 0892-6638
DOI - 10.1096/fasebj.2019.33.1_supplement.616.3
Subject(s) - medicine , aortic arch , right common carotid artery , common carotid artery , vertebral artery , anatomy , dissection (medical) , brachiocephalic artery , cadaveric spasm , subclavian artery , radiology , aorta , cardiology , carotid arteries
Head and neck vascular variations are common in human beings, but often go undetected. They are generally asymptomatic. Awareness of such anatomical variations is clinically important for surgeons and interventional radiologists as they may pose risk for iatrogenic complications or even the potential for unanticipated fatalities. Although aortic arch variations are relatively common in human fetuses, variations of its branches, i.e. the brachiocephalic trunk, the subclavian arteries, the vertebral arteries, and the common carotid arteries, are observed and/or described variably and fairly infrequently during human cadaveric dissection. When aberrant subclavian arteries are described in adults, they frequently involve the right side and are usually retroesophageal. In such cases, the right brachiocephalic trunk is absent. The following four branches of the aortic arch found most commonly then are: a left subclavian artery, an aberrant left vertebral artery, and right and left common carotid arteries. During cadaveric dissection of a 76 year‐old White male, we observed an additional fifth branch: an accessory left vertebral artery. A combination of five such aortic arch vessels in a single individual may be rare. Disclaimer: The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private ones of the author/speaker and are not to be construed as official or reflecting the views of the Department of Defense, the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences or any other agency of the U.S. Government. This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .