Premium
Investigating Novel Roles for Hedgehog Co‐Receptors During Craniofacial Development
Author(s) -
EchevarriaAndino Martha Luz,
Allen Benjamin
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
the faseb journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.709
H-Index - 277
eISSN - 1530-6860
pISSN - 0892-6638
DOI - 10.1096/fasebj.2019.33.1_supplement.326.1
Subject(s) - craniofacial , biology , neural tube , hedgehog , gli1 , microbiology and biotechnology , zebrafish , neural crest , hedgehog signaling pathway , sonic hedgehog , phenotype , mutant , genetics , anatomy , embryo , signal transduction , gene
Hedgehog (HH) signaling is essential for correct patterning of vertebrate embryos, including during craniofacial development. HH ligands signal through the canonical receptor Patched1 (PTCH1), and three co‐receptors–growth arrest specific 1 (GAS1), cell adhesion molecule‐related/down‐regulated by oncogenes (CDON), and brother of CDON (BOC). Together, these co‐receptors are required during embryogenesis to mediate proper HH signaling. However, recent genetic studies suggest tissue‐specific, antagonistic roles for these proteins. For example, Gas1 restricts the HH pathway during mouse tooth development, while Boc antagonizes HH signaling during zebrafish jaw formation. Here I explored possible antagonistic roles for GAS1, CDON and BOC in HH‐dependent mammalian craniofacial development. Genetic deletion of these co‐receptors results in variable holoprosencephaly (HPE) phenotypes (failure to divide the forebrain into two cerebral hemispheres). Gas1 mutant mice display a spectrum of HPE phenotypes, and significant patterning defects in the neural tube and limb. In contrast, genetic deletion of Boc does not perturb patterning in any of these tissues. Strikingly, the combined deletion of Boc and Gas1 results in more severe neural tube and limb patterning defects than those observed in Gas1 single mutants. However, the Gas1 craniofacial phenotype is partially ameliorated in Gas1;Boc double mutant embryos as determined by the levels of NKX2.1, Gli1 , Ptch1 and internasal distance quantitation. Micro‐computed tomography and skeletal analyses reveal that the rescue of the craniofacial defects in Gas1;Boc double mutants is restricted to the nasal bone and nasal capsule; other craniofacial bones are more severely affected, similar to what is observed in the neural tube and the limb. This effect does not appear to be due to differential GAS1 and BOC function in the forebrain neuroepithelium as overexpression of these co‐receptors in the developing chicken forebrain both promote HH signaling. Instead, I hypothesize that these co‐receptors have distinct, tissue‐specific functions in the craniofacial mesenchyme or the surface ectoderm. To further explore an antagonistic role for BOC during craniofacial development, I am currently deleting Boc in a sensitized HH genetic background through breeding with Ptch1 and Shh heterozygous mutant animals. These findings suggest that GAS1 and BOC do not function simply as redundant HH co‐receptors, but instead display distinct, tissue‐specific functions, particularly during craniofacial development. Support or Funding Information National Sciences Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program (DGE 1256260), Rackham Pre‐Candidate Graduate Student Research Grant, Bradley Merill Patten Fellowship and Organogenesis Training Grant (NIH T32HD007505) This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .