Evaluating the Pharmacodynamics and Protective Efficacy of Catalytic Bioscavenger following Subcutaneous Administration in Guinea Pigs

Previous studies determined the guinea pig was a viableanimal model for evaluating subcutaneous ( s.c. )injection as an alternative route of administration of catalytic Bioscavengers:enzymes designed to render nerve agents non‐toxic in systemic circulation following exposure. Recent studies have focused on evaluating the pharmacodynamics (PD) and protective efficacy (PE) of the lead bioscavenger candidate, organophosphorus hydrolase (OPH) variant, YT, as both unmodified and modified (PEGylated) versions of the enzyme. A comparative study was conducted with YT and three progressively sized PEG‐YT variants (934, 935, and 936) following a single bolus s.c. dose (5 mg/kg). Bioavailability increased linearly with molecular size such that the largest sized PEG‐YT variant, 936, afforded the highest bioavailability, thus promoting 936 to subsequent PD and PEstudies. Dose dependence on bioavailability was also examined via three cohorts of guinea pigs receiving doses (5, 15, 20 mg/kg) of either YT or 936 in which a linear dose response was also found. Guinea pigs receiving either YT or 936 (5 mg/kg) via intramuscular (i.m. )or s.c. routes had superimposable PD profiles regardless of route, suggesting an identical absorption pathway for the drugs. Protective efficacy was also evaluated by exposing the animals to 2xLD 50 of sarin (GB) 7 dayspost‐enzyme administration; only the animals receiving 936 ( i.m. and s.c. ) survived 24 hours post‐exposure. Periodic s.c. dosing strategies were also evaluated with 936 in which three injections were administered either 2 or 24 hours apart for a total dose of 15 mg/kg followed by a protective efficacy assessment 8 days post‐administration. Overall these data support the use of s.c . injection as a practical route of administration for catalytic bioscavenger with PE Gylation, synergistically enhancing both bioavailability and extending drug half‐life in circulation. Support or Funding Information The views expressed in this abstract are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the official policy of the Department of Army, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. The experimental protocol was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee at the United States Army Medical Research Institute of ChemicalDefense and all procedures were conducted in accordance with the principlesstated in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and the AnimalWelfare Act of 1966 (P.L. 89–544), as amended. This work was supported by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency‐Joint Science and Technology Office, MedicalS&T Division. *Thisresearch was supported in part by an appointment to the Postgraduate ResearchParticipation Program at the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of ChemicalDefense administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Educationthrough an interagency agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy and USAMRMC. This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .