Premium
Differential Expression of Cannabinoid Receptors, CB1R and CB2R, in Prostate Tumor Samples with Perineural Invasion
Author(s) -
Alicea Reyes Tatiana M,
FloresOtero Jacqueline
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
the faseb journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.709
H-Index - 277
eISSN - 1530-6860
pISSN - 0892-6638
DOI - 10.1096/fasebj.2018.32.1_supplement.lb590
Subject(s) - prostate cancer , perineural invasion , prostate , cancer research , metastasis , immunohistochemistry , cancer , cannabinoid receptor , pathology , receptor , medicine , oncology , agonist
Perineural invasion (PNI) affects over 20% of patients with prostate cancer who often recur with metastasis primarily to the bones. Despite its association with the patient's poor prognosis and dissemination of various cancers, knowledge of the regulatory mechanisms that drive invasion of prostate cancer cells through and around nerves is limited. Cannabinoid receptors (CBRs) are highly enriched in prostate cancer cells and exogenous application of CBR ligands attenuates the cell's survival, migration and invasion ability. Our objective is to define whether activation of the endocannabinoid system (ECS) associates with PNI and to identify the endogenous regulatory mechanisms through which the ECS promotes prostate cancer cell invasion through nerves. We used immunohistochemistry technique to determine the expression levels of the CB1R and the CB2R in formalin‐fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) prostate tumor samples with PNI. Preliminary data from our laboratory show that CB1R is highly enriched in FFPE prostate tumor samples with PNI when compared to CB2R. Given the increase of the CB1R in PNI FFPE samples, we used total internal fluorescence reflection microscopy (TIRFm) to elucidate in vivo the trafficking kinetics of CB1Rs in highly invasive versus less invasive prostate cancer cells, PC3 and 22RV1, respectively. We found that PC3 cells display constitutive CB1R trafficking. However, this was not the case for the less invasive prostate cancer cells, 22RV1. Our results suggest that the elevated CB1R levels detected in the FFPE PNI positive samples is not coincidental, but rather an indication of an association of the ECS and PNI. Ongoing studies aim to determine how nerve‐PC tumor interactions encourage PNI by using an in vitro model in which we can modulate the ECS. Support or Funding Information Grants: RCMI‐NIMHD 8G12MD007600 to JFO. This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .