Premium
Evaluation of pro‐pol Frameshifting Efficiencies for Naturally Occurring Variants of HTLV‐1
Author(s) -
White Emily A.,
Mouzakis Kathryn,
Williams Marcus,
Nash Hannah,
Hamilton Adam,
Harrison Jacob,
Eades Austin,
Daily Leandrew,
Contreras Uriah,
CooperSansone Andrew,
Chadeayne Devon,
Banks Terrance,
Abrams Tara,
Joe Natalie,
Mylroie Elena
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
the faseb journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.709
H-Index - 277
eISSN - 1530-6860
pISSN - 0892-6638
DOI - 10.1096/fasebj.2018.32.1_supplement.651.16
Subject(s) - frameshift mutation , pseudoknot , translational frameshift , point mutation , genetics , mutagenesis , biology , mutation , computational biology , microbiology and biotechnology , rna , gene
Human T‐cell leukemia Virus Type 1 (HTLV‐1) utilizes two ‐1 programmed ribosomal frameshifts (PRFs) to translate its enzymatic proteins. This translational mechanism induces a change in the ribosomal reading frame during elongation, which allows for the production of proteins from alternate reading frames within a single transcript. Frameshifting is utilized by many retroviruses and is often required for successful replication. Each frameshift site includes three components: a heptad “slippery sequence”, a spacer, and a downstream structure. Preliminary data from our group suggests that the HTLV‐1 pro‐pol frameshift site structure is a pseudoknot. Interestingly, multiple HTLV‐1 isolates include point‐mutations within this pseudoknot structure. How these mutations affect the ‐1 PRF efficiency is uncertain. Here, we investigate the impact of several pseudoknot point‐mutations on the HTLV‐1 pro‐pol frameshift efficiency. Site‐directed mutagenesis was used to insert these mutations into a dual‐luciferase vector that includes the HTLV‐1 pro‐pol frameshift site. The mutated DNA for each variant was transcribed, translated, and used in a dual‐luciferase assay, allowing calculation of the in‐vitro ‐1 PRF efficiencies for each mutant. Our preliminary data suggests that these point‐mutations create significant differences in the ‐1 PRF efficiency. Support or Funding Information NIH NIGMS SCORE SC2 Award (Award# 1SC2GM121197‐01) and Research Corporation for Science Advancement Cottrell Scholar Award (Award #23983) This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .