z-logo
Premium
The anti‐angiogenic vascular endothelial growth factor isoform, VEGF165b transiently increases microvascular hydraulic conductivity independently of VEGF receptor 2 signalling in vivo
Author(s) -
Glass Catherine Ann,
Harper Steven,
Bates David Owen
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
the faseb journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.709
H-Index - 277
eISSN - 1530-6860
pISSN - 0892-6638
DOI - 10.1096/fasebj.20.4.a705-d
Subject(s) - angiogenesis , in vivo , vascular endothelial growth factor , receptor , vascular permeability , medicine , endocrinology , chemistry , vegf receptors , biology , microbiology and biotechnology
VEGF 165 is a potent angiogenic factor that increases microvascular permeability by VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR‐2) signalling (1). VEGF 165 b is an endogenous splice variant of VEGF (2) that inhibits VEGF 165 induced angiogenesis (3). We recently showed that VEGF 165 b transiently increases hydraulic conductivity (4). The aim of this study was to determine if VEGF 165 b also increases permeability through VEGFR‐2 signalling. Hydraulic conductivity, L p was measured in MS222 anaesthetized frogs using the Landis‐Michel micro‐occlusion method (5). All animals were humanely killed at the end of the procedure. 14 mesenteric microvessels were perfused with 1% BSA then perfused with 1nM VEGF 165 b. L p (x10 −7 cm.s −1 .cmH 2 O −1 ) increased 2.7 ± 0.4 fold (mean±sem) from 1.8 ± 0.4 with BSA to a peak of 4.4 ± 1.2 with VEGF 165 b (p<0.01, Wilcoxon). The vessels were washed with 1% BSA for 10 minutes then with the VEGFR‐2 inhibitor, 10nM ZM323881 for 10 minutes before being perfused with VEGF 165 b and ZM323881. L p increased 2.2 ± 0.3 fold from 1.4 ± 0.3 with ZM323881 alone to 2.6 ± 0.5 with VEGF 165 b and ZM323881 (p=0.0001, Wilcoxon). There was no significant difference between the VEGF 165 b induced fold increases in Lp with or without ZM323881 (p>0.05, Wilcoxon). These results show that VEGF 165 b, unlike VEGF, acutely increases Lp independently of VEGFR‐2 signalling. This work was funded by The Richard Bright VEGF Fund and The Luff Fund.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here