Premium
A Study of Maize Endosperm Hardness in Relation to Amylose Content and Susceptibility to Damage
Author(s) -
DombrinkKurtzman M. A.,
Knutson C. A.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
cereal chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.558
H-Index - 100
eISSN - 1943-3638
pISSN - 0009-0352
DOI - 10.1094/cchem.1997.74.6.776
Subject(s) - endosperm , amylose , starch , amylopectin , chemistry , granule (geology) , scanning electron microscope , botany , food science , ultrastructure , biochemistry , materials science , biology , composite material
The relative amounts of amylose and amylopectin in maize starch were determined in samples representing hard and soft endosperm. Although differences were small, amylose content differed significantly ( P < 0.001 and P < 0.05) between the two types of endosperm, with hard endosperm containing a higher percentage of amylose. Scanning electron microscopy was used to determine that the surface appearance of starch granules from hard and soft endosperm differed. Starch granules from soft endosperm had randomly distributed pores on their surfaces, which had a rough appearance. Few pores were observed on granules from hard endosperm. A fairly common occurrence with starch granules from soft endosperm was the development of wrinkles or fissures upon prolonged exposure to the beam of the electron microscope. Thus, a correlation existed between endosperm hardness, amylose content, and susceptibility to wrinkling and fissures. The granules of the soft endosperm of maize, presumably less mature than the granules of the hard endosperm, have a lower amylose content (20.5 ± 1.9% vs. 23.0 ± 1.0%), exhibit more surface pores, and are more susceptible to wrinkling in an electron beam, compared with granules of the hard endosperm. Results suggested that the composition and internal architecture of the starch granule differ depending on the hardness of the endosperm from which it was obtained.