Premium
Extraction of Antioxidants from Wheat Bran Using Conventional Solvent and Microwave‐Assisted Methods
Author(s) -
Oufnac David S.,
Xu Zhimin,
Sun Ting,
Sabliov Cristina,
Prinyawiwatkul Witoon,
Godber J. Samuel
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
cereal chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.558
H-Index - 100
eISSN - 1943-3638
pISSN - 0009-0352
DOI - 10.1094/cchem-84-2-0125
Subject(s) - chemistry , trolox , solvent , bran , acetone , methanol , extraction (chemistry) , hexane , chromatography , organic chemistry , antioxidant , raw material , dpph
Total phenolic and tocopherol contents and free radical scavenging capability of wheat bran extracted using conventional and microwave‐assisted solvent extraction methods were studied. Three different solvents (methanol, acetone, and hexane) were used in the conventional solvent extraction. Methanol was the most effective solvent, producing higher extraction yield (4.86%), total phenolic compound content (241.3 μg of catechin equivalent/g of wheat bran), and free radical scavenging capability (0.042 μmol of trolox equivalent/g of wheat bran) than either acetone or hexane. However, there was no significant difference in the total tocopherol contents (13.6–14.8 μg/g of wheat bran) among the three different solvent extraction methods. Microwave‐assisted solvent extraction using methanol significantly increased the total phenolic compound content to 467.5 and 489.5 μg of catechin equivalent; total tocopherol content to 18.7 and 19.5 μg; and free radical scavenging capability to 0.064 and 0.072 μmol of trolox equivalent/g of wheat bran at extraction temperatures of 100 and 120°C, respectively. However, extraction yields of conventional methanol solvent and microwave‐assisted methanol extractions at different temperatures were not significantly different.