Premium
Single Kernel Near‐Infrared Analysis of Tetraploid (Durum) Wheat for Classification of the Waxy Condition
Author(s) -
Delwiche Stephen R.,
Graybosch Robert A.,
Hansen Lavern E.,
Souza Edward,
Dowell Floyd E.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
cereal chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.558
H-Index - 100
eISSN - 1943-3638
pISSN - 0009-0352
DOI - 10.1094/cc-83-0287
Subject(s) - starch synthase , amylose , genotype , cultivar , null allele , biology , starch , food science , botany , chemistry , microbiology and biotechnology , allele , horticulture , genetics , gene , amylopectin
Plant breeding programs are active worldwide in the development of waxy hexaploid ( Triticum aestivum L.) and tetraploid ( T. turgidum L. var. durum ) wheats. Conventional breeding practices will produce waxy cultivars adapted to their intended geographical region that confer unique end use characteristics. Essential to waxy wheat development, a means to rapidly and, ideally, nondestructively identify the waxy condition is needed for point‐of‐sale use. The study described herein evaluated the effectiveness of near‐infrared (NIR) reflectance single‐kernel spectroscopy for classification of durum wheat into its four possible waxy alleles: wild type, waxy, and the two intermediate states in which a null allele occurs at either of the two homologous genes ( Wx‐1A and Wx‐1B ) that encodes for the production of the enzyme granule bound starch synthase (GBSS) that controls amylose synthesis. Two years of breeders' samples (2003 and 2004), corresponding to 47 unique lines subdivided about equally into the four GBSS genotypes, were scanned in reflectance (1,000–1,700 nm) on an individual kernel basis. Linear discriminant analysis models were developed using the best set of four wavelengths, best four wavelength differences, and best four principal components. Each model consistently demonstrated the high ability (typically >95% of the time) to classify the fully waxy genotype. However, correct classification among the three other genotypes (wild type, wx‐A1 null, and wx‐B1 null) was generally not possible.