Open Access‘It is good to have a target in mind’: qualitative views of patients and parents informing a treat to target clinical trial in juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus
Author(s) -
Eve Smith,
Sarah L Gorst,
Eslam AlAbadi,
Daniel Hawley,
Valentina Leone,
Clarissa Pilkington,
Athimalaipet V Ramanan,
Satyapal Rangaraj,
Arani Sridhar,
Michael W. Beresford,
Bridget Young
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
rheumatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.957
H-Index - 173
eISSN - 1462-0332
pISSN - 1462-0324
DOI - 10.1093/rheumatology/keab173
Subject(s) - medicine , thematic analysis , asymptomatic , disease , qualitative research , physical therapy , pediatrics , family medicine , clinical psychology , surgery , social science , sociology
Objective We sought to explore patient and parental views on treatment targets, outcome measures and study designs being considered for a future JSLE treat-to-target (T2T) study. Methods We conducted topic-guided, semistructured interviews with JSLE patients and parents and analysed the audio recorded interviews using thematic approaches. Results Patients and parents differed regarding symptoms they felt would be tolerable, representing ‘low disease activity’. Patients often classed symptoms that they had previously experienced, were ‘invisible’ or had minimal disruption on their life as signs of low disease activity. Parents were more accepting of visible signs but were concerned about potential organ involvement and symptom severity. Overall, patients and parents preferred that children were entirely asymptomatic, with no ongoing treatment side effects. They regarded fatigue as particularly challenging, requiring proper monitoring using a fatigue patient-reported outcome measure. Most families felt that reducing corticosteroids would also be a good treatment target. Overall, families liked the concept of T2T, commenting that it could help to improve disease control, help structure treatment and improve communication with clinicians and treatment compliance. They were concerned that T2T might increase the frequency of hospital visits, thus impacting upon schooling, parental employment and finances. Families made suggestions on how to modify the future trial design to mitigate such effects. Conclusion This study provides guidance from patients and parents on T2T targets and study designs. Complementary quantitative studies assessing the achievability and impact of different targets (e.g. lupus low disease activity state or remission) are now warranted to inform an international consensus process to develop treatment targets.